Welcome, Guest. Please Login
SLINGING.ORG
 
Home Help Search Login


Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
.44 magnum claim (Read 386 times)
timothyausten
Tiro
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 17
Western Flinland
Gender: male
.44 magnum claim
Dec 3rd, 2024 at 1:28pm
 
The comparison between the kinetic energy delivery of a sling and a .44 magnum holds true, so long as the slingstone is large enough. The kinetic energy of a 16 gram .44 round is 1036.8 Joules. For example, it is possible to match the kinetic energy of a .44 magnum with an 8 kg stone thrown 26.45 meters, or a 4 kg stone thrown 52.9 meters. It becomes increasingly difficult with smaller stones. For example, a 125 gram stone must be thrown hard enough to reach 1692.73 meters (about a mile). These estimations are made, assuming a 45° launch angle, without taking wind resistance into account, using:


velocity = √(distance·9.8/sin(2·angle))


Joules = kg·m/s2/2

meters             kg      
13224.49  0.016      
3385.47    0.063      
1692.73    0.125      
846.37          0.250      
423.18          0.500      
211.59          1.000      
105.80          2.000      
52.90          4.000      
26.45          8.000      
13.22          16.000      
6.61          32.000      

My calculations:
velocity based on distance.xlsx
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 21st, 2024 at 6:47am by timothyausten »  

chart.png (9 KB | 14 )
chart.png
 
IP Logged
 
joe_meadmaker
Slinging.org Administrator
*****
Offline


Slinging Ice is Cool!

Posts: 3343
PA, USA
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #1 - Dec 3rd, 2024 at 10:10pm
 
timothyausten wrote on Dec 3rd, 2024 at 1:28pm:
an 8 kg stone thrown 26.45 meters

Hmmm...........where to find an 8 kg stone???  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
timothyausten
Tiro
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 17
Western Flinland
Gender: male
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #2 - Dec 4th, 2024 at 3:34am
 
I'd like to see you sling an 8 kg stone 26.46 meters. You might have to pirouette, or use a staff sling, or both. 😃
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
joe_meadmaker
Slinging.org Administrator
*****
Offline


Slinging Ice is Cool!

Posts: 3343
PA, USA
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #3 - Dec 4th, 2024 at 7:08pm
 
I started looking at cannon balls on ebay.  Grin

Kind of expensive, but not too crazy.  I think I might give it a go.  It will need to wait a little while though.  I hurt my left arm moving my target around and it still needs some healing time.  I'll definitely need two good arms for handling that weight.  I'd prefer the weather be a little warmer too.  So maybe in the spring.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
timothyausten
Tiro
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 17
Western Flinland
Gender: male
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #4 - Dec 5th, 2024 at 2:06am
 
Take it easy. 😎
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
JudoP
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Rocks away!

Posts: 1004
UK
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #5 - Dec 27th, 2024 at 9:41am
 
These comparisons are eyecatching, but I would question their usefulness. As a relatively large man at full sprint I can exceed the kinetic energy of a .44 round.

Ke = 1/2 mv^2 = 1/2 * 110 * (5m/s)^2 = 1375J

Yet a rugby tackle from me would obviously not be as lethal as a 44 round. Not even as much as a 22 round which is far lower energy (and probably a better comparison of the type of energies that can be generated with a sling generally).

With bullets we have to consider the lethality of a small dense object effectively focusing that energy to a small area. The pressure that can be created at impact point is enough to tear holes through flesh which can have lethal effects. Huge slingstones cannot generate that kind of pressure and cannot kill via that mechanism. It's really comparing apples and oranges at this stage.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
timothyausten
Tiro
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 17
Western Flinland
Gender: male
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #6 - Dec 27th, 2024 at 6:58pm
 
I often hear the .44 magnum comparison being repeated, but without any facts to back it up. I recently I saw an Instagram post claiming to throw with the same energy or with the same stopping force as a .44, and the slinger was only throwing a medium-sized rock, like around 100 grams. I couldn't find the origin of the claim, or any mathematical analysis to support it.

I've only seen empirical tests with ballistics dummies and various food targets, but they don't always say quantitatively how much energy goes into the throw, which is why I've done a ''back of the envelope" analysis here. I am not looking to debunk the .44 claim, so much as show under what circumstances it might be possible. If anyone wants to record a .44 magnum equivalent throw, then they can use the analysis here to support their demonstration.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
joe_meadmaker
Slinging.org Administrator
*****
Offline


Slinging Ice is Cool!

Posts: 3343
PA, USA
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #7 - Mar 2nd, 2025 at 9:37pm
 
JudoP wrote on Dec 27th, 2024 at 9:41am:
These comparisons are eyecatching, but I would question their usefulness.

100% agree.  As timothy mentioned, the term normally used in this claim is 'stopping force' or 'stopping power'.  The term itself is pretty unspecific, and nowhere I've seen making this claim includes an explanation of how they determined stopping power.

I think it's perfectly fine to push back on this claim.  There was a post on Instagram not too long ago sharing it, and I left a comment referring to it as an urban legend.  The person who posted the claim mentioned a Net Geo video and I was able to find this: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/ancient-slingshot-lethal-44-m... (Note: When you go to this site, you will need to enter an email address to view the article.  You can certainly use your own, but you can also just use a fake one like peanutbutter@jelly.com, or something like that and it will show you the article.)  The article is from 2017 so could possibly be the initiator of this claim.  But like all the others making this claim, there is zero explanation about how the comparison was determined.  This is the specific claim made in the article:

Recent experiments conducted in Germany showed that a 50-gram Roman bullet hurled by a trained slinger has only slightly less stopping power than a .44 magnum cartridge fired from a handgun.

And that's all the info they give.  Huh
And that statement is immediately followed by this one:

Other tests revealed that a trained slinger could hit a target smaller than a human being from 130 yards away.

I feel that I've seen some pretty amazing slingers in the short amount of time I've been involved in this stuff.  But sorry, targeting an individual person from 130 yards (118 meters)?!  Tell me another one!
Given enough chances to make the hit, sure.  But that's conveniently not part of the article.  They definitely let it be implied that a slinger is going to make that hit regularly.

In short, yeah, I'm totally fine with pushing back on the .44 Mag claim.  At least until someone explains how they calculated/determined stopping power.  Then it might make sense.  But I think the concern there would be similar to what JudoP mentioned.  I'm sure we could find tons of other things that also have the stopping power of a .44 Mag.  Like a big guy running.  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Q
Junior Member
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 65
Gender: male
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #8 - Mar 3rd, 2025 at 1:44am
 
I commented on one of Joe's responses that contested the claim. it was, for some reason, deleted.

A slinger theoretically throwing a 6oz (170g) stone at 100m/s (224mph) would generate ~850J of energy, which is comparable to the energy generated by a .45-70 or .30 carbine, but no where near a .44mag.

I highly doubt even the best slingers in the world could throw a 6oz Stone at 100m/s unless they were freaks of nature that pushed the threshold of human physiological potential. And to reach the same amount of energy with the most common weights of projectiles throughout history (1-3oz/28-84g), it would require velocities beyond human capability.

With a 3-6oz stone, 22LR is the most plausible comparison for elite slingers; maybe 9mm for the best in history. But .44mag is a hard no.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Q
Junior Member
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 65
Gender: male
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #9 - Mar 3rd, 2025 at 1:54am
 
joe_meadmaker wrote on Dec 4th, 2024 at 7:08pm:
I started looking at cannon balls on ebay.  Grin

Kind of expensive, but not too crazy.  I think I might give it a go.  It will need to wait a little while though.  I hurt my left arm moving my target around and it still needs some healing time.  I'll definitely need two good arms for handling that weight.  I'd prefer the weather be a little warmer too.  So maybe in the spring.


Sand cast one with lead. The diamter of an 8kg lead cannon ball should be about 2in, so slightly smaller than a tennis ball.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
joe_meadmaker
Slinging.org Administrator
*****
Offline


Slinging Ice is Cool!

Posts: 3343
PA, USA
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #10 - Mar 3rd, 2025 at 10:17am
 
Q wrote on Mar 3rd, 2025 at 1:44am:
I commented on one of Joe's responses that contested the claim. it was, for some reason, deleted.

Oh wow!  All of the replies are gone.  I remember your comment, and posted another reply too.
Well, I guess that girl running the account has shown she doesn't actually care about slinging, she's just using it to grab attention.  Kind of disappointing.  Now I have to talk myself out of leaving another comment asking why all the questioning/pushback was deleted. Roll Eyes



Q wrote on Mar 3rd, 2025 at 1:54am:
Sand cast one with lead. The diamter of an 8kg lead cannon ball should be about 2in, so slightly smaller than a tennis ball.

That's a really good idea.  But I reeeeaaaaaaaally want a cannon ball.  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
xud9a - call me zud 👍
Funditor
****
Offline


Ringing Slocks !

Posts: 876
Nottinghamshire, England
Gender: male
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #11 - Mar 3rd, 2025 at 10:58am
 
Well, I can't grant your wish on a cannon ball but as consolation here is a picture of Chesterfield Cannon Mill - a place where they were made.
Enjoy.
Back to top
 

Image00001-1.jpg (425 KB | 7 )
Image00001-1.jpg

My outlook on life is Aristotalean; on seeing an Acorn I see a potential oak tree rather than Plato's view that it is a failed copy.
BE SAFE,    BE SMILEY,   BE STRANGE
 
IP Logged
 
JudoP
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Rocks away!

Posts: 1004
UK
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #12 - Mar 3rd, 2025 at 1:33pm
 
I think a lot of people get the 'stopping power' claim from the momentum of the projectile. Since momentum p=mv , compared to kinetic energy K=1/2mv^2 it scales better with mass of the projectile and is less dependant on speed. As a result you can make even more eye catching comparisons with bullets!

Sling:
p = mv = 0.1kg * 40m/s = 4 kgm/s

9x19mm:
p = mv = 0.008kg * 350m/s = 2.8 kgm/s

44 magnum:
p = mv = 0.016kg * 360m/s = 5.76 kgm/s

So the momentum of a 100g stone slung at 40m/s far exceeds a 9mm round and is fairly close to a 44 magnum.

The same criticism still applies but even more so:

Me at full sprint:
p = mv = 110kg * 5m/s = 550 kgm/s

So if the sling has comparable stopping power to a 44 magnum, I have about 100x as much stopping power than a 44 magnum  Cool

The problem is stopping power seems to be quite ill defined, and the lethality of bullets is not really due to their transfer of momentum. Otherwise the person holding the gun would suffer the same injury through recoil of the actual person getting shot!

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Q
Junior Member
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 65
Gender: male
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #13 - Mar 3rd, 2025 at 2:09pm
 
Quote:
Oh wow!  All of the replies are gone.  I remember your comment, and posted another reply too.
Well, I guess that girl running the account has shown she doesn't actually care about slinging, she's just using it to grab attention.  Kind of disappointing.  Now I have to talk myself out of leaving another comment asking why all the questioning/pushback was deleted. Roll Eyes


I was disappointed as well. I had no beef with the channel/podcast and was looking forward to supporting it, but if they are going to delete comments trying to correct info then its a no from me dawg.

Quote:
That's a really good idea.  But I reeeeaaaaaaaally want a cannon ball.  Grin


If you mean an iron cannon ball then yeah...I have no idea how to smelt iron in a backyard foundry without it getting a little bit spicy lol.

I'd try to cast you a lead cannon ball if I had excess, in part because I would also get the benefit of confusingmy local post office with a 18lb small priority box. Unfortunately, good 'ol Pb is getting harder to come by these days in the islands (a 1oz sinker is like $2-3 now  Shocked ) and I mustn't part with my precious.



Back to top
 

My_precious.jpg (18 KB | 14 )
My_precious.jpg
 
IP Logged
 
joe_meadmaker
Slinging.org Administrator
*****
Offline


Slinging Ice is Cool!

Posts: 3343
PA, USA
Re: .44 magnum claim
Reply #14 - Mar 3rd, 2025 at 7:00pm
 
JudoP wrote on Mar 3rd, 2025 at 1:33pm:
So if the sling has comparable stopping power to a 44 magnum, I have about 100x as much stopping power than a 44 magnum

Grin Grin Grin



Q wrote on Mar 3rd, 2025 at 2:09pm:
I had no beef with the channel/podcast and was looking forward to supporting it, but if they are going to delete comments trying to correct info then its a no from me dawg.

Completely agree.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: joe_meadmaker, Rat Man, woodssj)