Slinging.org Forum - Optimal rate of failure to improve.

Morphy Slinging.org Moderator Offline Checkmate Posts: 8102	Re: Optimal rate of failure to improve. Reply #15 - Nov 25^th, 2023 at 5:48pm @Blindsquirrel - Squirrel, cant speak for anyone else but nothing youve said offends me. I like straight talk brother. If thats your thoughts on it by all means speak your mind. We dont all have to agree with each other here all the time. Things stagnate if we dont speak out.
Back to top	IP Logged

NooneOfConsequence

Slinging.org Moderator

Offline

Posts: 2985
Texas

Re: Optimal rate of failure to improve.
Reply #16 - Nov 29^th, 2023 at 9:09am

Tomas wrote on Nov 12^th, 2023 at 6:26am:

Time to humble myself.
To achieve the rate of failure described in this clip I'm going to have to shorten the distance, shorten the sling and define a larger target than I'm used to aiming for.
Anyone else want to join in an compare results and timeline?

https://youtu.be/81shDwRwD8U?si=P4BhlWfZrJlbYVos

Ok, but why do you need to change 3 things simultaneously to achieve this metric? Maybe try changing one at a time?

I’m specifically interested in why you think a shorter sling would improve accuracy. Assuming the same ammo, short slings have a higher natural frequency, which means your timing needs to be more precise to be accurate.

“My final hour is at hand. We face an enemy more numerous and cunning than the world has yet seen. Remember your training, and do not fear the hordes of Judas. I, without sin, shall cast the first stone. That will be your sign to attack! But you shall not fight this unholy enemy with stones. No! RAZOR GLANDES! Aim for the eyes! May the Lord have mercy, for we shall show none!“ -Jesus the Noodler

IP Logged