Soma_Trip
Novicius
Offline
Like tying a stone to a sling, is honor to fools..
Posts: 9
Austin, Texas
Gender:
|
So maybe let's revise this from "god of slinging" specifically, to deity, spirit, or cultural figure that employs or is responsible for the development and/or use of slinging. Even the most mundane aspects of life will typically have some sort of cultural explanation, a story associated with how it came about, and most gods have symbols or tools they are associated with through a profession or practice. I agree that the smelting of metals with bright shiny aspects of the sun was a major step in human development, and one that would be shrouded in myth and mystery - especially when that metal actually did crash down through the heavens as in the case of meteoric iron. Even the fashioning of bows, arrows, atlatls and darts is a far greater investment and has that much more prestige attached to it as a result, to say nothing of stone tools (especially those "eccentric" chipped stones one finds in Mesoamerica).
But slinging is still a highly variable endeavor that would surely help from the assistance of some sort of god, don't you think? I mean, who do you pray to when you need a hit? Whose cosmological realm is it? I think more importantly, you are both hitting upon something I didn't include in my original post for fear of dragging it out too long, and that's the social standing of slinging. We don't consider slings a godly weapon because of our cultural ideals of worth, and a sling just seems simple, humble and mundane to us (which apparently are not godly characteristics). There's a sort of general dismissal amongst the public, which becomes especially problematic in antiquities research where the sling often remains unknown or ignored - such as when mass finds of sling-bullets have been ignored or mislabeled (there's a thesis out there from 2013 about this by Barbora Kubikova that does a good job of showing the treatment of such finds up to that date, to cite just one thing). Slinging is a dim part of our culture today but one generally misunderstood or under-evaluated, which becomes a sort of vicious cycle - we don't really see slings in our cultural representations, which colors how we study and understand history, which informs our cultural representations, and so on.
In the so-called old world, use of the sling seems to have become a marker of cultural embarrassment, something you used when you couldn't afford anything else, and I think that is a stigma that in some ways remains with us today - completely removed from any argument on its effectiveness or non-effectiveness. But there are cultures where we can assume that the sling was not so culturally dismissed. In Polynesia/Oceania we have evidence of carefully shaped sling-stones, and the descendants of the Inca still weave intricately patterned slings, some apparently just for ceremonial purpose. A culture that values the sling and slinging highly is probably going to reflect that through the spiritual-symbolic lens of religion that they see the world through - however developed or defined that belief system is.
It makes sense to me that the sling would be associated with storms and disease in certain cosmologies - Apollo was associated with healing, but also with striking one down in the first place. Also interesting that there's often a twin connection somewhere - maybe something to do with the act of cordage making? Twining bits of fiber together until you have something stronger and more useful than the original? I doubt the word similarity holds true throughout, but the cosmological twins are near universal, probably speaking to their great antiquity.
That's the other aspect that may be coming into play here - the deep-time antiquity of the whole thing. After all, I don't think cordage making is an invention of our species, but something probably far older, so is it conceivable that the sling itself is an concept-invention-discovery we can't lay claim to? Deities and belief systems have been replaced and recalibrated countless times before, maybe I'm just looking for belief systems older than memory. Overall I just think it fascinating that with the sling we can see how a technology in continuous use fares in that shuffle and evolution of world-view. After all, if it still performs today exactly as it did millennia ago can we really consider it obsolete? And who gets to define such things?
Anyways, I think I'm loosing my thread and the dogs are beginning to bark for breakfast (hope it all makes enough sense). Hirtius, do you think you can shoot me a more full citation on where you found the Zuni and Iroquois info (is it the "...little people" 1946 article)? Anything else anyone is able to find would also be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Cheers!
|