Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
Slinging.org Forum
›
General
›
General Slinging Discussion
› Biconicals or teardrops for range?
(Moderators: Chris, Morphy, joe_meadmaker, Rat Man, Curious Aardvark, Kick, vetryan15)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
Biconicals or teardrops for range? (Read 2912 times)
czechslinger1.0
Descens
Offline
Slinging Rocks!
Posts: 193
Gender:
Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Jul 4
th
, 2021 at 2:17pm
I have not yet tested this out. So I want to ask for your experiences. Which sling ammo flies better: biconicals or teardrops?
So far I had only used either clay biconicals, balls or ovals(from which straightest and furthest flying were biconicals)
But in my last patch of clay slingstones I made some teardrops to see how they fly to test against my usual sling-shot shapes(which of course all of those are in this patch), still waiting for them to dry to finally test it out for myself.
I am very curious about this and I'd like to hear with which of these you get the best range and how would you compare teardrops to other sling ammo shapes.
Back to top
IP Logged
Kick
Forum Moderation
Offline
Posts: 4451
Finland
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #1 -
Jul 4
th
, 2021 at 2:47pm
I personally haven't tried tear drop shaped ammo, but I can't see them sitting all that comfortably in a "normal" sling pouch. I really look forward to seeing what you find in your experiments.
Back to top
You are a great guy Kick but also slightly scary at times. - Morphy
"Nothing matters, but it’s perhaps more comfortable to keep calm and not interfere with other people." - H.P. Lovecraft, in a letter to Frank Belknap Long, 7 October, 1923
IP Logged
czechslinger1.0
Descens
Offline
Slinging Rocks!
Posts: 193
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #2 -
Jul 4
th
, 2021 at 3:31pm
Kick wrote
on Jul 4
th
, 2021 at 2:47pm:
I personally haven't tried tear drop shaped ammo, but I can't see them sitting all that comfortably in a "normal" sling pouch. I really look forward to seeing what you find in your experiments.
True, I want to try them out with my normal slings, but I think I will have to make a sling with specialised pouch for teardrops. That means making another sling to my already ridiculously big sling collection which is great fun!
Back to top
IP Logged
IronGoober
Interfector Viris Spurii
Online
...and now, No. 1, the
larch...
Posts: 1601
California
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #3 -
Jul 4
th
, 2021 at 5:22pm
If you do, can you please try Albion's half Cortaillod sling? I'd be interested to see how it works for others. If I can find a good range, I'll make one for myself.
https://slinging.org/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1172017416/6825
Back to top
John R.
IP Logged
AncientCraftwork
Interfector Viris Spurii
Offline
Posts: 2403
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #4 -
Jul 5
th
, 2021 at 5:04am
there is no need for a special pouch design for tear drops but of course it can be made. But a split pouch or pouch that slightly cups works great. The heavy part of the teardrop is in front, so place that in the center of the split so that the tail sticks out. They work fantastic. I have not scientifically calculated the range but I think it's greater than biconicals to the eye. They seem to fly losing very little velocity
Back to top
All Glory to God forever and ever, amen
IP Logged
czechslinger1.0
Descens
Offline
Slinging Rocks!
Posts: 193
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #5 -
Jul 5
th
, 2021 at 6:12am
AncientCraftwork wrote
on Jul 5
th
, 2021 at 5:04am:
there is no need for a special pouch design for tear drops but of course it can be made. But a split pouch or pouch that slightly cups works great. The heavy part of the teardrop is in front, so place that in the center of the split so that the tail sticks out. They work fantastic. I have not scientifically calculated the range but I think it's greater than biconicals to the eye. They seem to fly losing very little velocity
Yes I tried to put one that is almost dry into my long balearic sling and spin it and it didn't fall out, so specialised sling isn't indeed needed.
I look forward to seeing for myself how they fare against my usual glandes. There has to be a reason they made sling bullets in this shape when biconical shape was available.
Back to top
IP Logged
AncientCraftwork
Interfector Viris Spurii
Offline
Posts: 2403
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #6 -
Jul 5
th
, 2021 at 6:18am
it is the most aerodynamic shape
Back to top
All Glory to God forever and ever, amen
IP Logged
Scorpion Vin
Descens
Offline
Still slinging better
than archery!
Posts: 210
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #7 -
Jul 5
th
, 2021 at 3:54pm
This form became the prototype of the bullet Minié, which replaced the round musket bullets
Back to top
Minie_Balls.jpg
(108 KB |
17
)
"Do you know, that in a universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom.” ― Terry Pratchett
IP Logged
Scorpion Vin
Descens
Offline
Still slinging better
than archery!
Posts: 210
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #8 -
Jul 5
th
, 2021 at 4:02pm
Thus, the sling was the first weapon for which bullets were made in ancient times, in general, the sling is the prototype of a firearm
Back to top
"Do you know, that in a universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom.” ― Terry Pratchett
IP Logged
czechslinger1.0
Descens
Offline
Slinging Rocks!
Posts: 193
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #9 -
Jul 5
th
, 2021 at 4:55pm
Scorpion Vin wrote
on Jul 5
th
, 2021 at 4:02pm:
Thus, the sling was the first weapon for which bullets were made in ancient times, in general, the sling is the prototype of a firearm
Since I first tried biconical clay glandes I like to think of slings as ancient rifles. There are many similarities in how sling bullets fly to rifle bullets, especially when it comes to the way they are stabilised. If you look at a modern rifle bullet it looks almost perfectly like glandes used in the ancient times. I actually have a .50 cal bullet here and I think it would make excelent sling ammo. But now I have to resist the urge to sling it
Back to top
IP Logged
Jaegoor
Interfector Viris Spurii
Offline
Slinging Rocks!
Posts: 2811
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #10 -
Jul 5
th
, 2021 at 9:03pm
Do a simple experiment. Throw ammunition high in the air. Or they drop ammunition from a great height. How does the projectile hit?
Back to top
Bono Mellius
IP Logged
Mersa
Interfector Viris Spurii
Offline
Druid
Posts: 2598
Australia
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #11 -
Jul 6
th
, 2021 at 8:38am
I think this question has so many layers.
It’s hard to really say without a lot of testing and defined parameters.
So let’s say that volume and material is set , so they both weight the same but have different surfaces and shape.
Now let’s say launch speed and angle are the same, in a vacuum they both travel the same distance.
So the real question is really about the aerodynamics of the projectile.
I would assume that the teardrop would be best if spin (rifle spin) wasn’t a factor. But with spin perhaps the teardrop is les stable , maybe the biconical has a better coefficient when spin is added to the equation.
It’s interesting for sure
Back to top
Razor glandes, Aim for the eyes!!!
IP Logged
Curious Aardvark
Forum Moderation
Offline
Taller than the average
Dwarf
Posts: 13965
Midlands England
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #12 -
Jul 6
th
, 2021 at 3:01pm
Well one reason biconical was more popular is probably simply because you can load a biconical into a pouch anyway round.
teardrop shape would need to be placed a lot more precisely.
In the heat of battle when you're under pressure. You don't want to be fiddling about loading ammo.
No clue on which would fly furthest. Interested to see how you get on czechslinger
Back to top
Do All things with Honour and Generosity: Regret Nothing, Envy None, Apologise Seldom and Bow your head to No One - works for me
IP Logged
czechslinger1.0
Descens
Offline
Slinging Rocks!
Posts: 193
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #13 -
Jul 6
th
, 2021 at 5:07pm
Mersa wrote
on Jul 6
th
, 2021 at 8:38am:
So the real question is really about the aerodynamics of the projectile.
It always has been about aerodynamics, in vacuum a tennis ball would fly the same as 57g rock or clay/lead glande. Which is why I think it is such a shame humans can't live in vacuum, slinging on the Moon would be fun as heck!
Back to top
IP Logged
Jaegoor
Interfector Viris Spurii
Offline
Slinging Rocks!
Posts: 2811
Gender:
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #14 -
Jul 6
th
, 2021 at 6:42pm
In fact, I have so far reached the greatest distances with one ball. A biconic projectile only flies to the apex with a spine. Then it falls sideways and is braked heavily
Back to top
Bono Mellius
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
Slinging.org Forum
›
General
›
General Slinging Discussion
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
(Moderators: Chris, Morphy, joe_meadmaker, Rat Man, Curious Aardvark, Kick, vetryan15)
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
General
- General Slinging Discussion ««
- Slinging as a Sport, Competition Rules, Slinging Awards And Events
- Project Goliath - The History of The Sling
- Sling Academy - Tutorials, Instructions, and How-To Videos
- Slinging on Social Media - Catch This!
- Other Topics
- Trading Post
- Other Primitive Weapons
- Introductions
- Here Be Maths...
- Administrative
- Remembering Fellow Members
Members Outlet Mall
- Market Place
Slinging.org Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5.2
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.