Welcome, Guest. Please Login
SLINGING.ORG
 
Home Help Search Login


Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Biconicals or teardrops for range? (Read 2912 times)
czechslinger1.0
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 193
Gender: male
Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Jul 4th, 2021 at 2:17pm
 
I have not yet tested this out. So I want to ask for your experiences. Which sling ammo flies better: biconicals or teardrops?
So far I had only used either clay biconicals, balls or ovals(from which straightest and furthest flying were biconicals)

But in my last patch of clay slingstones I made some teardrops to see how they fly to test against my usual sling-shot shapes(which of course all of those are in this patch), still waiting for them to dry to finally test it out for myself.

I am very curious about this and I'd like to hear with which of these you get the best range and how would you compare teardrops to other sling ammo shapes.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Kick
Forum Moderation
*****
Offline



Posts: 4451
Finland
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #1 - Jul 4th, 2021 at 2:47pm
 
I personally haven't tried tear drop shaped ammo, but I can't see them sitting all that comfortably in a "normal" sling pouch. I really look forward to seeing what you find in your experiments.
Back to top
 

You are a great guy Kick but also slightly scary at times. - Morphy
"Nothing matters, but it’s perhaps more comfortable to keep calm and not interfere with other people." - H.P. Lovecraft, in a letter to Frank Belknap Long, 7 October, 1923
 
IP Logged
 
czechslinger1.0
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 193
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #2 - Jul 4th, 2021 at 3:31pm
 
Kick wrote on Jul 4th, 2021 at 2:47pm:
I personally haven't tried tear drop shaped ammo, but I can't see them sitting all that comfortably in a "normal" sling pouch. I really look forward to seeing what you find in your experiments.

True, I want to try them out with my normal slings, but I think I will have to make a sling with specialised pouch for teardrops. That means making another sling to my already ridiculously big sling collection which is great fun!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
IronGoober
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Online


...and now, No. 1, the
larch...

Posts: 1601
California
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #3 - Jul 4th, 2021 at 5:22pm
 
If you do, can you please try Albion's half Cortaillod sling? I'd be interested to see how it works for others. If I can find a good range, I'll make one for myself.

https://slinging.org/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1172017416/6825
Back to top
 

John R.
 
IP Logged
 
AncientCraftwork
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline



Posts: 2403
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #4 - Jul 5th, 2021 at 5:04am
 
there is no need for a special pouch design for tear drops but of course it can be made. But a split pouch or pouch that slightly cups works great. The heavy part of the teardrop is in front, so place that in the center of the split so that the tail sticks out. They work fantastic. I have not scientifically calculated the range but I think it's greater than biconicals to the eye. They seem to fly losing very little velocity
Back to top
 

All Glory to God forever and ever, amen
 
IP Logged
 
czechslinger1.0
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 193
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #5 - Jul 5th, 2021 at 6:12am
 
AncientCraftwork wrote on Jul 5th, 2021 at 5:04am:
there is no need for a special pouch design for tear drops but of course it can be made. But a split pouch or pouch that slightly cups works great. The heavy part of the teardrop is in front, so place that in the center of the split so that the tail sticks out. They work fantastic. I have not scientifically calculated the range but I think it's greater than biconicals to the eye. They seem to fly losing very little velocity


Yes I tried to put one that is almost dry into my long balearic sling and spin it and it didn't fall out, so specialised sling isn't indeed needed.
I look forward to seeing for myself how they fare against my usual glandes. There has to be a reason they made sling bullets in this shape when biconical shape was available.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AncientCraftwork
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline



Posts: 2403
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #6 - Jul 5th, 2021 at 6:18am
 
it is the most aerodynamic shape
Back to top
 

All Glory to God forever and ever, amen
 
IP Logged
 
Scorpion Vin
Descens
***
Offline


Still slinging better
than archery!

Posts: 210
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #7 - Jul 5th, 2021 at 3:54pm
 
This form became the prototype of the bullet Minié, which replaced the round musket bullets
Back to top
 

Minie_Balls.jpg (108 KB | 17 )
Minie_Balls.jpg

"Do you know, that in a universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom.” ― Terry Pratchett
 
IP Logged
 
Scorpion Vin
Descens
***
Offline


Still slinging better
than archery!

Posts: 210
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #8 - Jul 5th, 2021 at 4:02pm
 
Thus, the sling was the first weapon for which bullets were made in ancient times, in general, the sling is the prototype of a firearm
Back to top
 

"Do you know, that in a universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom.” ― Terry Pratchett
 
IP Logged
 
czechslinger1.0
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 193
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #9 - Jul 5th, 2021 at 4:55pm
 
Scorpion Vin wrote on Jul 5th, 2021 at 4:02pm:
Thus, the sling was the first weapon for which bullets were made in ancient times, in general, the sling is the prototype of a firearm


Since I first tried biconical clay glandes I like to think of slings as ancient rifles. There are many similarities in how sling bullets fly to rifle bullets, especially when it comes to the way they are stabilised. If you look at a modern rifle bullet it looks almost perfectly like glandes used in the ancient times. I actually have a .50 cal bullet here and I think it would make excelent sling ammo. But now I have to resist the urge to sling it Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jaegoor
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 2811
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #10 - Jul 5th, 2021 at 9:03pm
 
Do a simple experiment.  Throw ammunition high in the air.  Or they drop ammunition from a great height.  How does the projectile hit?
Back to top
 

Bono Mellius
 
IP Logged
 
Mersa
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Druid

Posts: 2598
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #11 - Jul 6th, 2021 at 8:38am
 
I think this  question has so many layers.

It’s hard to really say without a lot of testing and defined parameters.

So let’s say that volume and material is set , so they both weight the same but have different surfaces and shape.

Now let’s say launch speed and angle are the same, in a vacuum they both travel the same distance.

So the real question is really about the aerodynamics of the projectile.

I would assume that the teardrop would be best if spin (rifle spin) wasn’t a factor. But with spin perhaps the teardrop is les stable , maybe the biconical has a better coefficient when spin is added to the equation.

It’s interesting for sure
Back to top
 

Razor glandes, Aim for the eyes!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Curious Aardvark
Forum Moderation
*****
Offline


Taller than the average
Dwarf

Posts: 13965
Midlands England
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #12 - Jul 6th, 2021 at 3:01pm
 
Well one reason biconical was more popular is probably simply because you can load a biconical into a pouch anyway round.
teardrop shape would need to be placed a lot more precisely.

In the heat of battle when you're under pressure. You don't want to be fiddling about loading ammo.

No clue on which would fly furthest. Interested to see how you get on czechslinger Thumbs Up
Back to top
 

Do All things with Honour and Generosity: Regret Nothing, Envy None, Apologise Seldom and Bow your head to No One  - works for me Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
czechslinger1.0
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 193
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #13 - Jul 6th, 2021 at 5:07pm
 
Mersa wrote on Jul 6th, 2021 at 8:38am:
So the real question is really about the aerodynamics of the projectile.

It always has been about aerodynamics, in vacuum a tennis ball would fly the same as 57g rock or clay/lead glande. Which is why I think it is such a shame humans can't live in vacuum, slinging on the Moon would be fun as heck!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jaegoor
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 2811
Gender: male
Re: Biconicals or teardrops for range?
Reply #14 - Jul 6th, 2021 at 6:42pm
 
In fact, I have so far reached the greatest distances with one ball.  A biconic projectile only flies to the apex with a spine.  Then it falls sideways and is braked heavily
Back to top
 

Bono Mellius
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Chris, Morphy, joe_meadmaker, Rat Man, Curious Aardvark, Kick, vetryan15)