English_Marauder wrote on Nov 18
th, 2013 at 4:23pm:
K=1/2mxv squared
when you plug the numbers in to this basic formula you will notice that velocity plays a much bigger role in producing energy than mass.
This statement is correct.
Quote:mass contributes by a coefficient of 1/2
while velocity contributes by its square.
This statement is wrong. Mass contributes linearly, while velocity by its square. The factor 1/2 applies to both the mass and the velocity.
Quote:What I am trying to say is, that when you are "lobbing" at a somewhat constant velocity increasing the weight of your projectile even by double is not actually producing that much more power. actually you are probably producing a lot less power using the bigger stone, as the bigger stone is probably travailing at a lower velocity.
In end. increasing the weight of the projectile without increasing the velocity, does not give you much if any(depending on whether the shot slowed down do to increasing the weight) extra Kinetic energy/destructive power.
I disagree.
Your statement is: I can easily increase my movement speed to increase my energy, while maintaining the same accuracy. Here I disagree. I get a lower accuracy as I do my movements faster.
My statement is: I can increase my energy if I take heavier stones, but keep my movements at a constant speed. This keeps my accuracy.
I can double the weight of my projectile.
If I would keep the the weight constant I would have to increase my velocity by a factor of sqrt(2)= 1.41 to achieve the same energy. I am not able to increase my movement speed by this factor while maintaining my accuracy.
The target of my reasoning was how to proceed to maximize energy (which I think is the target of your reasoning) and accuracy (without which power is useless) from a given starting point: Someone who is able to throw accurate but not full power at a target.
My main point is: Don't focus only on speed. There is also weight. Don't think black and white. There is also grey. Trying to increase speed is not wrong. I also try it. But only trying to maximize speed is also not the perfect way to maximize energy while maintining accuracy.
But as Thearos pointed out: The question is if the "lobbed" shot is powerful enough to inflict harm. And yes, it is in my opinion.