hi A_S at least you aren't making cheap comments and posting pictures of a potato; i wonder if that's a kind of racism since i'm currently resident in Ireland - in which case TS is not only pathetic, he's wrong again - it should have been a lime.
Quote:Ecc 3:21 Who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth?
i'm glad you quoted that line from ecclesiastes, (my favorite book of the OT) but the quote is more accurately rendered thus -
Quote: Who knows
whether
the spirit of man goes upward and the spirit of the beast goes down into the earth?
even Solomon doesn't know what happens after death to the "spirit"
Quote:Your reply seems made up of words only.
all replies here are made up of words, there isn't much i can do about that. getting back to the moon question, which i wasn't dodging, your assessment certainly agrees with current theory, that at the formation of the earth at over 1 billion years ago, the moon was part of the earth, and the orbit has gradually increased.
it also dates the formation of the earth to a much earlier date than a literal creationist would admit. unlike you and i, these people would rather skip the maths to keep their beliefs intact - very unscientific.
re. the genealogy of JC, i concede your point - legally Joseph was JC's father - however, my doubt was, that by linking JC by blood to david, to fulfill the prophecy of the messiah being a descendant of david, the doctrine of the trinity was compromised. nevertheless, as a legal son of joseph, JC could claim to be a descendant of david in the sense of being of david's family line.
however, the demons which JC cast out recognised him as "son of david" - they were under no doubts
since you mention that you don't have much time to wade through your opponent's "counterblastes" i better call it a day
thanks for the civil, reasoned interchange
SV