sv
|
hi Funslinger
you are right, corroboration is the key. however, it is impossible for an account to verify itself. the only account of the water and blood wound is in the Bible itself, which we "know" to be true because it's the word of God. by the same reasoning, the account of Mohammed's ascent into heaven astride a winged horse must also be true, since the Koran is (it says!) the word of God - like the Bible, the only verification for it's divine origin is what we read in it - what it says about itself. so IF Jesus was dead (as proved by the spear) and came back to life then what the Bible says is true. But if it isn't true, and was written years after the event after legends had started to spring up, how would we know? as i said earlier, we choose for or against a religion, depending on our innate characters, then review the evidence from a for-or-against standpoint.
"why has no-one seen Julius Caesar, who lived 2000 years ago?"
- because he's dead
"why has no-one seen Jesus Christ, who lived 2000 years ago?
- because he's alive but we can't see him? errrm, is there a problem here??
i'll stick with "not proven"
SV
|