Welcome, Guest. Please Login
SLINGING.ORG
 
Home Help Search Login


Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Effective range: Sling vs. Arrow (Read 27534 times)
siguy
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


si vis pacem para bellum

Posts: 1714
connecticut
Gender: male
Re: Effective range: Sling vs. Arrow
Reply #30 - Jun 18th, 2006 at 5:26pm
 
Subotai_Ba_Atur, did you mix up the statement
" The sling probably outranges the bow as far as aimed shots are concerned, but can it match the indirect fire capabilities?"
meaning it to say the opposite, or did you do that on purpose?

i apologize for seeming to hunt you down for the purpose of disagreeing with you, but the development over time seems to agree that the bow is better for short ranges and the sling for longer.  also, it is my own judgement that the bow and the sling are both excelent weapons for the purpose of indirect fire.
Back to top
 

if you want peace prepare for war&&&&my site
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Subotai_Ba_Atur
Tiro
**
Offline


Slings don't kill people.
I do.

Posts: 14
Pluto
Gender: male
Re: Effective range: Sling vs. Arrow
Reply #31 - Jun 18th, 2006 at 7:07pm
 
No, not the opposite. I was talking about maximum effective range. The fact that lead shot is blunt means that it requires a good deal more force to be lethal than do arrows.

Archer volleys were fired at around a 45 degree angle. Can a sling bullet maintain lethality when fired like that? I'm not dissing slings, just trying to cllarify what we're talking about. Are we putting post-Roman bows into the equation here?
Back to top
 

Mffmggn flrrflrt glvncs!&&&&-Kenny McCormick
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Curious Aardvark, Bill Skinner, David Morningstar, Masiakasaurus, Chris, Rat Man, Mauro Fiorentini)