Quote:I did like you, but I got the time 0,57 seconds.
20 m / 0,57 = 35,0877193 meters/second = 126,315789 kilometers/hour
I don't know how I could done it different, when I got the time 0,57 second.
But, if you got the time 0,40, it'll be 20 / 0,40= 50 meter /second = 180 km/h.
I'm not sure who's time is right, but I got the time 0,57 seconds

A friend of me got 0,6 seconds when he measured.
Gard
Gard,
I know you got the 0.57 from your previous post

But, my question was: how did you get that time? What way of measure did you use? I was just curious. Doesn't matter if I got the 120 or 180 km/h, either if my estimation is exact or not. Could you exactly explain your measure? Anyway, I'm glad you like me

Tint,
I used a Canon's digital camera for still images, it gives only the 15 frames per sec. It is not a typical camcoder, so movies made by it are not the best. You can see, that the frame period is somewhat inregular, the 15 frms/s is an averange rate.
lobohunter
That is a good idea, but I think a stop watch is very unacurate tool at the 20 m. The time is too short, no body is able to cath a reliable measure.
Anyway, I'm also in 8)
Jurek