JudoP wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 3:28pm:


No - the sling rotates because the pouch becomes a drag to the north on the one side of its circle, and a drag to the south on the other side of its (= same) circle. A circle (respectivley "twist" / tornado, ...) shows two antithetical "moments" at the same time and thing.

JudoP wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 3:35pm:


Sure - but that are TWO forces at the same time and in counter-direction - not only one! So this example (and answer) speaks not for but against your own explanations!

Not I but you have to study this "physics of orbits" (respectively "physics all all") once more.

Quote:


I'm sorry you've taken this personally. I have nothing in this but to get the physics right, which honestly may prove too difficult for my rusty skills. I won't hesitate to question things I know to be incorrect however.

For whatever it's worth- I actually have a degree in theoretical physics- believe it or not. Circular motion I first covered at A-level.

Even so, If you don't want to take my claims at face value wikipedia and google will be in agreement with them.

JudoP wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 3:51pm:


Of course I did, because allready the "physics" are a "persons physics" (no person without or out of physics). Speak against physics if you want to speak against me or my mind, ratio, logic or LOGOS  .

JudoP wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 4:48pm:


Suuuper (*)! If instead your theorie is correct and from physics at its (decently) highest level, then you will much more easily and equal soon explain / declare where the "extra acceleration" of slung stones are coming from!

... but if not, then NOT!

So try to tell us (in mechanical details) the slings and human slingers generation of 240 km/h! And by the way: Lary Brays "stone" (!) had to be thrown with a "top speed" of 110 m/s - thats not only 240 km/h but 396 km/h ! ! !


_______________________________________________________
* In german we use to say "super!" instead of "perfect!" or "great!" if somthing is (super) great and / or (very) perfect!

JudoP wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 5:56pm:


But thats also "nonsens", because if you not see a primitiv slings physics correct, so you can't make us believe to have seen my "mistakes" or any higher physics "correct" in the meaning of "completely". A "slings theorie" touches only physics basics ("grammar school") - nothing for "quantum physics".

So what should be a "problem" to you in explanations for a slings physics?

Do you allready miss (-understand) the "basics" only? 

Honestly I have to admit: The speech "I'm the degreeded specialist in math & physics but do not have to have (captured) the full theory of its basics" sounds a little bit "very crazy" to me - even right if you want to say not to know, where a simple stones high velocity of more than 300 km/h could coming from, but to know where I have done theoretical mistakes.

What corious kind of "degree" is that?

What means "centrifugal force is a pseudo force"? Do you know what is the so called "true and lonley force of a united theory (of all)"???

I don't think you can really quantify larrys throw.
110 m/s is only one of the variables that contributed to the distance.
Spin of projectile Magnus effect and aero dynamics played a large role.
This could be argued on both the <110m/s>
We can speculate but we don't know the speed.

JudoP wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 6:49pm:


No - watching you I saw that it is not only possible but done actually. But "to be possible" doesn't mean "to be caused", "to be right" or "to be full of sense". The validity of a theory or a claim depends not on your jugdment - right not then if this judgment has no theory, causes or knowledge of its own - so to reject it only makes NO SENSE.


JudoP wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 6:49pm:


Correct - but they ARE consistent with the laws of physics absolutely: Whilst the western hemisphere of earth runs to the east and the eastern hemisphere runs to the west the earth goes round and turns - one force and direction of move against the other while beeing TWO FORCES (and exacly how I had drawn!) - and when your claim is that the same thing were wrong or inconsistant with the laws of physics then much more your claim is indisputable incorrect. As you said allready: "It says that you don't understand the physics only."

Obviously you don't know only how to rotate a steering-wheel (with one hand or with two hands) or why it has to be fixed on an axis.

Fact is: The bullet at a moved slinging circle mostly is to compare with a rolling wheel, where the pouch is that point on the wheel that touches the ground and firstly stays "back on the road" while its axis go on. Right the point at its opposite moves with the highest speed (relative to the touching-point - not to the axis-point). Exactly this point then has to become the point of pouch (or bullet).

So what are we talking about, here??? About simply slung stones or about god and (his) whole world and physics?