Welcome, Guest. Please Login
SLINGING.ORG
 
Home Help Search Login


Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 17
Send Topic Print
Absolute maximum slinging length (Read 34310 times)
Thearos
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Take that

Posts: 3410
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #150 - Aug 23rd, 2017 at 7:20am
 
I get the bits about long and thin sling; I'm interested about the issues of torsion; I agree with weight and best ammo, and energy conservation. I am even ready to agree that helo is problematic, even though it's the only way I sling; I've never tried pirouette.

What I don't understand, and may have missed, is how Mr Apoc slings, and would be interested to find out more.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
johan
Funditor
****
Offline


no longer active:keep
the flame of slinging
alive

Posts: 531
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #151 - Aug 23rd, 2017 at 7:31am
 
Thearos wrote on Aug 23rd, 2017 at 7:20am:
and may have missed, is how Mr Apoc slings, and would be interested to find out more.


my understanding from his posts is :
helicopter style with multiple rotations at max.
and then a perfect arm path and as long as it can be .

much like what anyone does for range probably like yurek. but how 100m/s is possible i don't know. i start to think it could be genetics (bruce lee like Tongue)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Apex-apoc
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 171
nahe Nürnberg (Germany)
Gender: male
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #152 - Aug 23rd, 2017 at 10:06am
 
Thearos wrote on Aug 23rd, 2017 at 7:20am:
What I don't understand, and may have missed, is how Mr Apoc slings, and would be interested to find out more.


My slinging style is similar at the most to that of D. McNamara, respectively like he does in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK3H45Qld3k  (especially like done in the last 30 sec. of this video ... but without the "twitches" that are a sign of "overexertion" or uncertainty)

With this style it is very easy to create very steep release-angles (30° - 60°) or even to throw in the tops of high trees that are standing very close (... because this style is pretty close to "underarm" where bullets practicaly comes "from below").

Otherwise nearly right as parmenion said:

• High initial velocity (min. 3 rps.)
• A significant long "extension" = hands / arms motion from behind the body into its front - so "long streched" (surposed from the whole upper body) ...
• ... started at the perfect moment ... (can be felt) *
• ... and done in a very short time (can be practiced / trained) *

The special difficulty is to absolve such a wide extension within that short time, because the SEQUENCE (!) of such a high rotated sling is only 1/3 second (frequence = 3 rps !) - so its last half is a 1/6 second only (if not even much shorter because of its high acceleration!). In this time the whole extension of length up to 2,6 m has to be started and completed.


* Attention: Right this generates an extremly high burden to the ellbows inner side and can cause joint-inflammatory very easily. Do not practice more than 25 throws per week when they are so hard ... or for practice take tennis-balls instead of more heavy stones ! ! !
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 24th, 2017 at 2:06pm by Apex-apoc »  
 
IP Logged
 
Thearos
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Take that

Posts: 3410
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #153 - Aug 23rd, 2017 at 10:54am
 
Mr Morningstar, for his helicopter style, also recommends pushing the arm as far back as possible.

I like the point about timing in the swing (quite difficult to get right). The idea about explosive concentration of movement is also interesting.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Apex-apoc
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 171
nahe Nürnberg (Germany)
Gender: male
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #154 - Aug 23rd, 2017 at 11:55am
 
Thearos wrote on Aug 23rd, 2017 at 10:54am:
I like the point about timing in the swing (quite difficult to get right).


Yes - if you want to catch it correct for best range then its time window is even smaller than the window for the correct moment of release. Perhaps +/- 1/40 second. To fail it means not allways an interruption of release-process (to start trough anew) but allways a loss of some range.

While throwing stones that loss can count up to 35 m (so not "+/-" but allways "minus") or 10% of aimed distance. First when this loss would be more - also "felt as more" - then the body or brain decides for an interruption. Thats why it comes often to such (thus?) moments, where you not know how to decide when not knowing what you want.

Therefore you have to choose (or to imagine / remember) a target even when accuracy then no more counts. Because to have no target (aim) the brain makes to much confused. This necessary target then is only for knowing what you want to do. First when such a target is known, decided or remembered, then the brain can handle all "feelings" right. If not then not.

Otherwise you allways risks a "twitch", an interruption and / or loss of range (= throws that are to short / weak for reaching the target).

So to have a target is better in each case - while throwing for range only or only for accuracy. Because throwing for "nowhere & all over" (like McNamara for his filmed video-demonstration has tried in its last 40 seconds) makes your body or brain absolutely gaga / confuse.

McNamara there was not concentrated for a complete (sensefull) throw but to demonstrate a "motion without a sense (= aim / target)". This is why he twiched / interrupt a few times: He was confused because the sense / aim of his task was not decided but "twice" or twofold.

Distances without target does not exist (!) - so never throw for ranges without a target. A distance is only that what have a start and an end.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 24th, 2017 at 3:58am by Apex-apoc »  
 
IP Logged
 
Apex-apoc
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 171
nahe Nürnberg (Germany)
Gender: male
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #155 - Aug 23rd, 2017 at 2:52pm
 
johan wrote on Aug 21st, 2017 at 11:57am:
jax used fins on some of his designs:http://slinging.org/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1227069230/30


Parmenion: Sorry for overlooking one or two of your mentions / questions ... but I said it allready to jax: Cause of drag these fins or flags lets the pouch not turning absolutly free. But while rotating the sling in helicopter-style the pouch has to turn in the same direction, number and frequence as the sling, respecively the sling hand. So these fins would only twist up the pouch if the sling gets a lot of turns.

Loading-time:

Loading time also is not so strong in my focus or researching, but when this "instant-release-mechanism" is combined with jaxons "captured release machanism", these loading time should become shorter, because then you practically have a kind of "muzzle-loader" - also not only two but three sides for loading.

Those slings can load stones like a excavator shovel.   Wink

But such tricks as "to catch a up-thrown stone from air" (like legendary Ayla shall have done)* than aren't possible anymore, because slings "phase", respectivley "force line" than is broken (respectively to weak / instabil).  Undecided


_______________________________________________________

Please help in grammar: Must I write "... Ayla shall have done" or "should have done" (as the author wrote) ???  ... and: "AN up-thrown stone", "A up-thrown stone"  or "a thrown up stone" (in german: "auf~" od. "hochgeworfener Stein") ???
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 23rd, 2017 at 7:03pm by Apex-apoc »  
 
IP Logged
 
Apex-apoc
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 171
nahe Nürnberg (Germany)
Gender: male
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #156 - Aug 23rd, 2017 at 3:51pm
 
johan wrote on Aug 23rd, 2017 at 7:31am:
but how 100m/s is possible i don't know.


For this you only had to understand the dynamic of pendulum (and A. Einstein): When a permanent "extension" (acceleration) is given to a deflected pendulum then it also would commute even without a field of gravity (... "gravitiy propably is nothing else as an accelerated inertial-system ... heavy mass = sluggish mass).

According to Einstein it doesnt matter if a force pulls on the pendel-mass or on its pivot point (in counter-direction). Therefore I said: "Imagine a (still standing) turntabel and put a mass on its edge. When trecking now the whole turntabel in perpendicular direction to the radius between pivot point and mass, then the table would start to turn (also without gravity or running motor)"

For this some very simple but very revealing experiments can be done with a simple flat round "can" (~ 12 or 15 cm wide; 3 - 10 cm high) and a much more simple "marbel" or small ball (Ø = 15 - 20 mm). To get the marbel (in the can) in some slowly rounds (= less "rps") you first have to move this can in bigger circles (... moving by hand). But when the marbel has gotten some faster "drive", then suffice SMALLEST LINEAR MOVEMENTS (back & forth) to make the same marbel even MUCH MORE FASTER (= a lot of "rps"). 

That kind of "running marbel in the can" indeed seems partially extremly "magic" ! There in is the slings enigma to find (... of course in the sling itself too, but in a small can and marble under hands and eyes the same pricipal is more easy to handle, watch and study).


_____________________________________________________

Please help in english: Is "motion" absolutely synonym to "movement" ???
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 24th, 2017 at 4:11am by Apex-apoc »  
 
IP Logged
 
Thearos
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Take that

Posts: 3410
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #157 - Aug 25th, 2017 at 2:39am
 
It sounds a bit like the style I called "full-on" and experimented with 3 years ago, when I had a lake and heavy round pebbles.

http://slinging.org/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1406286375/0

I note what you say about not having a target to aim at. But when I "stuttered" in the shot, it was not because of that uncertainty, but because I was not used to shoot at that weight (120g ?) and with that speed-- I fear uncontrolled accidents.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Thearos
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Take that

Posts: 3410
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #158 - Aug 25th, 2017 at 5:06am
 
To quote myself:
"Very high speed, always increasing, and whipping into the final insane speed is exactly the "edge-of-control" helicopter (or Balearic or whatever)"

" the extra fast spin really does make a huge difference ! And you have to build up to that with acceleration"

"...note the long ranges reached by "extreme speed" slinging. The knack is getting the transition from ultimate, high-speed rotation to the throw"

"Look at a vid of Yurek slinging, with the slow build-up to a final hurricane-speed loop and throw"

""hurricane' style with accelerated multiple rotations is best for long distance, if you can get control. "

"I then took out sling 2, which I haven't used in a while-- a Rockman, long, from finger to opposite shoulder. It's a bit difficult to shoot; fig-8 is out of the question. You need to start it up with firm revolutions (otherwise the stone might slip the pouch-- disgrace), then build up to the hurricane revolutions, and the full-on release-- great energy, full-on whang. This is shooting the "longsling" the slinging equivalent of the longbow, the great war bow."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMBJ0sofwwU
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
johan
Funditor
****
Offline


no longer active:keep
the flame of slinging
alive

Posts: 531
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #159 - Aug 25th, 2017 at 7:43am
 
@Thearos the problem is that describing the feel(of throwing) is a completely different thing than describing the actual motion..

Thearos wrote on Aug 25th, 2017 at 5:06am:
This is shooting the "longsling" the slinging equivalent of the longbow, the great war bow."

the longbow is good for war but not better than asiatic bows for range.

Thearos wrote on Aug 25th, 2017 at 5:06am:

lol the laugh Tongue
they seem out of tune to me .

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Apex-apoc
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 171
nahe Nürnberg (Germany)
Gender: male
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #160 - Aug 25th, 2017 at 7:50am
 
Thearos wrote on Aug 25th, 2017 at 2:39am:
not because of that uncertainty, but because I was not used to shoot at that weight (120g ?) and with that speed-- I fear uncontrolled accidents.


But to fear (as to feel or to imagine) uncontrolled accidents (= fail-shots) and "uncertainty" is quite similar to each other (... if not even the same) - isn't it ?!!

What else could go wrong if not only the bullet?

But I know what you mean: High speed rotation can make confuse the "feeling of rhythm" even when I only try to whip a whipped cream by hand and much too fast (faster than usually or "learned"). Then often comes the moment of "right now" where brain no longer knows where the hand or spoon is (... "what time it is" ... or what the rhythm should be). That feeling partially is like to be a "spazzer".

With practice the brain (and / or body) can learn to control each frequences nevetheless - even the very high frequences up to 5 or 6 rps. But more than 3 or 3,5 rps already range in the upper class of difficulty because the resulting centrifugal force becomes so high that at least the body (arm / hand) has to capitulate when also the wight of bullet is much more than 120 g. 

And to the bullet 3 rps in a long sling is much more speed than 3 rps in a short sling - as twice as high if also the length is twice.

Nevertheless there is an upper limit in length-increasing because the "effect" at least also depends of the relation between length of sling and "extension": Extension is relative - so even an extension of 2,5 m can be only a short one if the length of sling is 2,0 m too.

Best effects for range comes from a high relation (should be more than 2 - means twice as long as length of sling), but also this has to be in a good relation to the advantage of a greater radius (circumference). Therefore the best length of sling is somewhere between 1,15 m and double length of an arm (2 x 67 cm = 1,34 m in case of mine - but not measured to finger-tips but to the "ring-place" of ringfinger because there hangs my loop).

But also the learning of higher rotation speeds runs better if the practice allways keeps assigned to a target because brain also learns from feed-back: It always has to "see": "When feeling X (while release) then the result is Y".

...

Only for dreams the brain computes "prophecies / forecasts" from absolutly free founded parameters. But for reality it computes "highbills" only, only from known parameters (= amounts). Therefore it has to have experience, real results (= facts) and feed-back if it also wants to be a good slinger and not only a good dreamer.

And "yes" - even the change from shorter slings to longer slings (... to slings of different length and "haptic") has to be trained and learnded, because a real "sling-master" lands the bullet even than in the best place when for that only a "shitty old belt" or string tanga is given to him.

This is why I also want to have practice with (different) "sheperd slings" and not only with (different) "hunter slings". So do never brake your turnus of practice because of having broken your "best sling" only. When your best sling is broken or lost then train with your "bad sling" again, but never interrupt the practice for much more than only two weeks.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 25th, 2017 at 10:46am by Apex-apoc »  
 
IP Logged
 
Morphy
Slinging.org Moderator
*****
Offline


Checkmate

Posts: 8102
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #161 - Aug 25th, 2017 at 8:29am
 
The Full On thread LOL.... those were the days.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Apex-apoc
Descens
***
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 171
nahe Nürnberg (Germany)
Gender: male
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #162 - Aug 25th, 2017 at 11:05am
 
Thearos wrote on Aug 25th, 2017 at 5:06am:
To quote myself: ... but at the price of loss of control-- and elbow pain the next day.


Unfortunately I have to say the pain in your ellbow is a GOOD SIGN, because this indicates to have made a strong pull right against the pull of stone ... so in the correct moment. That's of course a conflict in moving-directions allways, but not to avoid (... mens arms anatomy isn't made right for this extreme contradiction).

Only the try to force the ellbows resistance evolution has absolutely to be avoid. In this case the PAIN, respectivley its smallest amount (and healing) has to be the "leader" in your range progression, because this evolution needs much more time than evolution of muscles.

Have allways a very close (carefully) watch at this pain but never call it a bad sign or an "enemy". Otherwise allready the range would become your enemy too.

Pull and keep ellbows pain in awareness / consciousness and handle it together with the range like a friend who has become a little bit ill - so start the ellbow to love (not the pain but the ellbow!), even when that special kind of care sounds a little bit like "esoteric hocus-pocus".

But now that I do not mean especially to you but "generally" (at all, of course).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Thearos
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Take that

Posts: 3410
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #163 - Aug 25th, 2017 at 11:31am
 
I meant uncertainty about not knowing what to aim at. I havent' shot "full on" for a long time, mostly just patzing at 25-50m.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 27th, 2017 at 12:37pm by Thearos »  
 
IP Logged
 
johan
Funditor
****
Offline


no longer active:keep
the flame of slinging
alive

Posts: 531
Re: Absolute maximum slinging length
Reply #164 - Aug 25th, 2017 at 11:52am
 
Thearos wrote on Aug 25th, 2017 at 11:31am:
I meant uncertainty about not know what to aim at. I havent' shot "full on" for a long time, mostly just patzing at 25-50m.


you are too conscious of your aim. your aim is at the direction your center of mass is moving, for long distance focus more on perfect form.

find a safe place to practice long distance slinging so the safety of other beings doesn't prohibit your performance.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 17
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Rat Man, Kick, vetryan15, joe_meadmaker, Morphy, Curious Aardvark, Chris)