I posted a link that explains, in detail, what confirmation bias is.
You can't even be bothered to read it and instead, post what
you think it is.
If you can't grasp the simple fact that Makron (and his contemporaries) were fooling around with perspective foreshortening to make his paintings more interesting to sell more pottery…and you insists that he was a technical illustrator interested in accurately portraying correct Greek slinging technique, in a circle motif, on a vase….. I don't really know what to say.
I wish you luck in your studies, may you find what you are looking for and make all your data fit your presuppositions.
Polemics don't seem to work here either. When, in the face of overwhelming common sense, one party puts his virtual fingers in his ears and goes la la la la la la…..
Well, thats not good for furthering anything.
We would be better served teaching people how to correctly plant their base foot in preparation for a strong throw, instead of fabricating dubious techniques that come from our favorite vase painting.
Thats just my opinion based on decades of training people in real martial
skills, not martial arts that charge $150 per head for a seminar or seek to profit from a ranking system.
What do you base your opinion on?
An illustrator who sells sword-training seminars and illustrated books and your feelings?
Even the title of this thread, "The Makron
position, a new way of slinging" is misleading, because you are deducing the movements of a an entire technique based on a static
position.
The drawbacks in your logic have already been explained and not just by me. If there is a flaw in my logic, please…enlighten.