Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
You don't know the difference between a primary and a secondary source. The information you gathered has absolutely no worth. Check the separate thread on slinging in Old Irish literature, where 10 minutes' searching got me 10 pages of primary references, and you might be able to start to understand the difference.
The information I googled because you couldn't be bothered gave you the name of two Icelandic sagas containing references to slings.
The rest is just the views of author of the source containing the information you desired. If that is worthless to you because the same information didn't come from the head of some over educated public school ponce, quoting a book he memorized from the classics of antiquity section of Eton library, well I guess thats your problem.
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
Let me spell it out for you. These are actual old Irish poems and chronicles, just as the Greek and Roman
So tell me Sir, when did the pre-Christian Irish and Norse start to write? Or where these "original" documents written by a Christian observing the society he was once born into. Or was he writing his version of the tales once told him as a child, as he sat in his cold dank cell in Vatican City practicing his Latin? Or was he a fortunate waif taken in by a kindly Christian king, who taught him to write and asked him to record the "ancient ways" of his pagan breatheren?
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
sources are actual historical sources-- which a historian knows how to treat critically (of course they may be later-- but some are technical treatises, and some are poems that claim realism in similes).
Oh sorry. You're a propa istorian guv'na. What evers was I be finking. Me a lowely gobby cow and all. I begs your pardons sir...
Unless they are written by the hand of the poems author, at the time, they are not "primary sources". The Icelandic sagas where not written down by the people of that culture. They where spoken. As with the Irish tales and poems. All early textual versions of these fables are secondary sources.
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
In contrast, your googling got a couple of pages of modern secondary treatment, i.e. modern guys talking about original texts. That's a basic distinction.
No. THAT is pompous academic snobbery. My googling gave me the names of two sagas that contained references to slinging. That was the information you asked for. The rest of the views expressed are of no importance, except of course that they are views of descendents living in the same environment, in the same society, writing their opinion of their cultural history.
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
How else are you going to find out how people slung in the past, if not by looking at sources and evidence ?
Very true. I suggest you Google the two sagas I told you about.
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
Weird paganist convictions are going to cut the mustard.
Interesting choice of words. Another example of living history contained in the phrase "cut the mustard". I digress because obviously that's just my weird paganist convictions again. Anyway,
So Friday isn't named after Freya/Frigg Odins wife?
Nor was Friday the original Sabbath day in many of the pre-Christian patriarchal religions of the Mediterranean, as it still is in Islam and Judaism?
And these living breathing aspects of our history that survive to today are just "Weird paganist convictions"? Not valid because they are not the written views of a Christian monk writing about a society he does not understand?
Let me ask you this oh wise sage of time. Are the 16th and 17th accounts of the peoples of the America accurate "primary" sources?
No sir. They are in general the biased and misguided views of highly religious people who believed their way of life superior.
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
How else did the modern guys you quote find out about the past, if not by reading actual sources ? On this sub-forum, let us cut out the middlemen, and think about historical evidence.
I gave you the names of two sagas and poems for you to research. Of course your views as posted here will just be a modern guys view and will therefore be worthless. Isn't that what you are saying?
Your view is that of a "real" historian expressing his views on "actual" historic sources.
Their views
have[sic] absolutely no worth because they are
modern guys talking about original texts.And my views are
worthless just
weird paganist convictions for quoting their work..
It surprises me that you ever manage to drag yourself away from that mirror every morning. I believe there's an ancient Greek myth about that sort of thing somewhere. I'll have to look it up.
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
No need to get anxious and aggressive if you don't know the historical sources. The internet is a great leveller-- you just have to go to the sources and look at them directly. That's how the people who are interested in historical swordsmanship go about it: they look stuff up and think about it.
If I was interested in reading about slinging in Irish or Norse mythology I might. However I'm not, so I don't.
I gave you the names of two sagas and some Irish poems to do your own research. I didn't realise I had to hold your hand and read you bedtime stories too.
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
In any case, I posted my question ("what about Irish sources ?"), in the hope that someone actually knew about them, for instance Snowcelt who used to frequent this forum.
Well I know a fair amount on pre-Christian northern European culture. Of course to you its all
Weird paganist convictions so you won't be interested.
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
And don't talk to me that way. Play the ball, not the man.
Show me the man? I've just answered a question posted online only to recieve a patronising reposte. Again. I'm starting to see a pattern.
Thearos wrote on Sep 19
th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
Your contributions are mere clutter. So stay polite, stay civill and keep off subjects you don't know anything about, nor how to treat.
Oup, there you go again. So my views are mere clutter. Stay off a topic I know nothing about. Don't answer insult with indignation. These are your rules huh.
Here's a good "Celtic" response to that;
We don't condone that kind of language
CA