Welcome, Guest. Please Login
SLINGING.ORG
 
Home Help Search Login


Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
The most efficient sling (Read 17821 times)
squirrelslinger
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


peace through superior
firepower

Posts: 2870
Ky, USA
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #30 - Dec 12th, 2013 at 6:43pm
 
Masiakasaurus wrote on Dec 12th, 2013 at 5:34pm:
squirrelslinger wrote on Dec 12th, 2013 at 4:58pm:
Masi, I get that you are an engineer...
but this is a practical conversation Wink

Which is perfect for me! Engineering is working with real problems and finding practical solutions. If you can't use it, it's not engineering. Cheesy
squirrelslinger wrote on Dec 12th, 2013 at 4:58pm:
I am with CA on practicality.

He, Timpa, English Marauder, and I are all saying the same thing about effectiveness. I'm just telling you that efficiency is not what you're really asking about. Not KE efficiency and not work efficiency. My posts only get long(
er
) and (
more
) complicated when I have to explain why you really care about usability/effectiveness. I can go a whole lot longer, too. This is me trying to not overwhelm you all.

To be honest, I enjoy puzzling out posts. It is rather fun, and generally helps me learn more about both slinging and engineering(if the poster is you).
Sometimes it helps me see why someone thinks the way they do, so I can then see the issue from their perspective and understand the meaning behind the words.

enough philosophy Wink
So you are using efficiancy in a practical sense. what is your idea of a practical sense for slinging?
I think... this needs to be experimented upon.
give me some ideas.
Back to top
 

“Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results.”
"You don't think the electricity is off. You check it 3 times to make SURE its off"
"Remember, this is not a scalpel. It is a steel wedge that you will be slamming into knotty wood. Hone accordingly."
 
IP Logged
 
jlasud
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Programming stones

Posts: 2358
Transilvania
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #31 - Dec 13th, 2013 at 1:46am
 
@ Masiaka: Would you do us a favor and measure the weight of 2m of steel wire you have and specify the diam. of it?
My 110cm sling weights 17-20grams by feel. Soon i'll weight it.

As far as I know, for something to brake the sound barrier, needs some Kinetic energy to do it. And that comes from the slinger. Goes into the sling and not into the projectile.

When an average slinger can throw ~40-50m with hand,with a powerful throw,and 200m with the same stone,using a sling and less energy than with throwing by hand
There's got to be some efficiency involved,along with leverage.
I'm not an engineer,just a stupid slinger, and to me better efficiency means getting more result from the same or less energy put into your system.
If it's a stove,it heats more,with less wood,if it's a car, goes faster,uses less fuel,if it's a sling, it slings faster, farther,with less power put in the throw.

Accuracy is totally up to the slinger. As far as the sling not poorly constructed,having a huge knot at the base of the release cord that deflects shot in a not consistent way.
Back to top
 

Respect existance or expect resistance!
 
IP Logged
 
Masiakasaurus
past-moderator
****
Offline


mah-SEE-a-kah-SOR-us

Posts: 6069
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #32 - Dec 13th, 2013 at 6:59am
 
Squirrel, I don't exactly know what you're asking.

Jlasud, I'll measure the wire as soon as I can. Piano wire is hard to measure diameter wise, however. I'm going to have to go to the store and tell you what the packaging says the diameter is.

As for breaking the sound barrier, that happens as the sling opens up completely. The sling has already transferred as much KE to the projectile as possible by that point and the projectile has left the pouch. The sling does not store energy except by stretching, so that energy really doesn't go into the sling. Cracking has no effect whatsoever on the projectile. A sling that cracks does indicate that it may be small enough to have less drag since a part of it it does go fast enough to break the sound barrier. This could mean that the sling moves faster before the projectile is released, that the projectile has a higher initial velocity, and therefore that the sling is more efficient. But it would be a very small difference in efficiency in most cases.

What you and squirrel describe about throwing the same stone farther and faster with a sling is called mechanical advantage. It has nothing to do with efficiency. If you can swing your arm faster while holding the sling and stone than you can with just the stone, then the sling is more efficient. If you can only move your arm the same speed, then the sling is just as efficient as throwing by hand. And if you have to swing your arm slower while slinging than throwing -even if the stone moves faster and goes farther- then the sling makes you less efficient.

Cars all have close to the same energy efficiency. In internal combustion engines, 30-35% of the energy from the fuel is used to pump the pistons. What you're referring to is economy. Some cars are more economical and can go farther with less fuel. Economy is a the efficiency of efficiency. Efficiency by itself has a very specific meaning.
Back to top
 

Pikåru wrote on Nov 19th, 2013 at 6:59pm:
Massi - WTF? It's called a sling. You use it to throw rocks farther and faster than you could otherwise. That's all. 
~Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily avialable, they will create their own problems.~
WWW elsabio04  
IP Logged
 
jlasud
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Programming stones

Posts: 2358
Transilvania
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #33 - Dec 13th, 2013 at 10:33am
 
Yes, a sling is an extension of your arm. A lever,which can hold and release ammo by holding the knot and letting go of the knot.

You can't break the sound barrier by flinging a thread around. It doesn't have enough mass to "store" enough energy,and speed to combat air drag,and accelerate to supersonic speeds.
When a slingstone is released from the sling,and starts to roll off the pouch, rolls on to the release cord,while it's pushing it,it transfers KE to the cord itself.
If the release cord weights 1.5oz (heavy balearic sling for ex.)
it's going to take more KE from the slingstone to push it out of the way,than if it would weight 0.5oz.


So what's an efficient lever?
My answer would be: that does the leverage,with the least amount of energy spent in/ the lever itself,due to air drag, friction, bending,stretching etc.

That,to my understanding would be something like a spider wire sling.
Thin, light,fast to move,and retains as little KE as possible.

Masi: how You define a efficient sling?

How you define an economical sling?
Back to top
 

Respect existance or expect resistance!
 
IP Logged
 
Masiakasaurus
past-moderator
****
Offline


mah-SEE-a-kah-SOR-us

Posts: 6069
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #34 - Dec 13th, 2013 at 2:20pm
 
The tip of a sling breaks the sound barrier in the same way that the tip of a whip does. It is possible to break the sound barrier by swinging an object. When they're used the way we're talking about, neither slings nor whips will store energy (except by stretching) and that is not how they accelerate or reduce drag. The energy that gets transferred to the sling is immediately transferred to the projectile.

The sling does not open because the stone pushes on it. Zither sling opens because the force acting on the sling is changing direction but the release cord has enough intertia to keep going in a straight line. At the same time, the projectile leaves the pouch because the centripetal force of the sling no longer acts on it. During this time the sling is still transferring energy to the projectile and this only stops when they no longer touch.

An efficient lever is stiff and inelastic. That's all it takes.

The most efficient sling will vary depending on what kind of efficiency you look at. I'm not sure that there's a kind of efficiency that would be important to look at, honestly. It's not a useful thing in slinging.

The most effective sling is completely inelastic and as long, as thin, and holding as heavy a projectile as the slinger can handle comfortably.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 14th, 2013 at 1:08am by Masiakasaurus »  

Pikåru wrote on Nov 19th, 2013 at 6:59pm:
Massi - WTF? It's called a sling. You use it to throw rocks farther and faster than you could otherwise. That's all. 
~Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily avialable, they will create their own problems.~
WWW elsabio04  
IP Logged
 
jlasud
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Programming stones

Posts: 2358
Transilvania
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #35 - Dec 14th, 2013 at 5:03am
 
Ok,i pretty much agree.
By "stored" energy ,i meant KE.
Momentum in fact. Yes, my physics notions are all over the place.
You're right about the release cord having inertia,and that alone is enough to open the sling upon release.
Hence a sling without being loaded still pops open when slung and released.
And thicker,heavier slings having more momentum,crack louder especially when loaded.
So maybe it takes away some energy from the stone to do that Wink

To my understanding,heavier slings have more momentum because they will """store/have""" more of the KE you put into the system (sling+AMMO).
The point of slinging is to accelerate the ammo to speeds much higher than by throwing by hand.
The weight of the sling(lever) also needs to be accelerated.
And the ammo does push the release cord,and produces friction also by doing it. Does costs efficiency IMO.
Back to top
 

Respect existance or expect resistance!
 
IP Logged
 
Bill Skinner
past-moderator
****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 3292
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #36 - Dec 14th, 2013 at 7:48am
 
So it sounds like both of you are describing a a one meterish long, paracord or smaller diameter, (Braided Kevlar, guitar string?) with a skeleton pouch and a button on the end of the release cord, (to pull the release cord open) type sling?

There's your description of the sling, Squirrel, that will be your baseline, you will need to start changing things to see what helps you end result, accuracy or distance.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Masiakasaurus
past-moderator
****
Offline


mah-SEE-a-kah-SOR-us

Posts: 6069
Alabama, USA
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #37 - Dec 14th, 2013 at 11:35am
 
jlasud wrote on Dec 14th, 2013 at 5:03am:
By "stored" energy ,i meant KE.
Momentum in fact. Yes, my physics notions are all over the place.


Think of the sling like an electrical wire. The force you apply at one end travels instantly to the projectile like electricity is instantly flowing through an appliance when you flip a switch. To store energy/momentum means that the force doesn't immediately go into the projectile when the sling is taut. Something else would have to happen for the force to act on the projectile. Slingshots store energy because pulling back makes a force act on the rubber bands and when you let go the rubber bands then exert their own force on the projectile. The sling has KE and momentum as it's being swung, but it is not stored.

jlasud wrote on Dec 14th, 2013 at 5:03am:
And thicker,heavier slings having more momentum,crack louder especially when loaded.
So maybe it takes away some energy from the stone to do that Wink


It's true that heavier slings will have more momentum at the same velocity and it's true that larger slings that can crack will crack louder. But cracking more loudly does not do anything to the projectile nor take anything away. It happens because heavier slings are less affected by drag (especially with a dense weight on the end) and can be swung faster. This gives more KE and momentum to the projectile during the throw rather than taking any away during the crack. And the stone will not be in contact with the sling at the moment that the crack happens.

jlasud wrote on Dec 14th, 2013 at 5:03am:
The point of slinging is to accelerate the ammo to speeds much higher than by throwing by hand.
The weight of the sling(lever) also needs to be accelerated.
And the ammo does push the release cord,and produces friction also by doing it. Does costs efficiency IMO.

Unless the sling is very heavy and has a lot of inertia, the release cord will not take energy or momentum away for the projectile. If it does, you will notice this as the sling fouling your shots and an inability to achieve a clean release.

Friction is not produced. Friction produces heat at the expense of other forms of kinetic energy. Negligible heat is produced from slinging, but it does not have a negligible effect. Friction between the pouch and the projectile induces the projectile to spin, which aids effectiveness while reducing efficiency. This friction is due  to contact with the pouch, not the release cord.

Bill Skinner wrote on Dec 14th, 2013 at 7:48am:
a one meterish long, paracord or smaller diameter, (Braided Kevlar, guitar string?) with a skeleton pouch and a button on the end of the release cord, (to pull the release cord open) type sling


The most effective length will vary from person to person. It's just the longest length that feels good with your favorite throwing style. Material doesn't matter as long as it's not stretchy, but I'd say paracord or something that diameter is a good starting point. Again, it will vary. Pouch material or style is least important because as far as physics is concerned the projectile and the pouch are one big mass gradient. The release cord needs something easy to grip, but I don't think it's mass would help the pouch much when opening.
Back to top
 

Pikåru wrote on Nov 19th, 2013 at 6:59pm:
Massi - WTF? It's called a sling. You use it to throw rocks farther and faster than you could otherwise. That's all. 
~Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily avialable, they will create their own problems.~
WWW elsabio04  
IP Logged
 
Cudol
Tiro
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 29
Alcoy (Spain)
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #38 - Dec 18th, 2013 at 4:21am
 
The most efficient sling is your short sling... or you "no sling" because the sling always is the cause of the lost part of power.

The balearic not is very efficient, although this is the one of the best slings, good wheight, durable, can throw big rocks, good accuracy, all "hand made" (very important in the survival concept)... but i don't think that this sling obtain the biggest scores in distance, the wheight is important in the accuracy, the balearic release the rock well because the sling without touch the rock but is bad for the efficience.

One long fine thread and strong with a minimal bag, design it for the lead, the same sling couldn't be the best sling with other projectile because the fight "density vs drag" (you can try throw a piece the foam with a 100cm sling? probably with uranium we can add more lenght in the sling)

In the ideal world (without friction) the best sling for the speed is the infinite lenght sling and projectile near to zero, the power is always the same, your arm, but the sling is a lever, you can change speed for the weight... in the real life the limit in the game forever is... i hate the friction, it is the cause of the one relation no lineal, Do you imagine that you can throw 0.5g plumb with a 100meters sling and you can break the barrier sound?... maybe in the moon  Cry .

Sorry my spanglish.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Cudol
Tiro
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 29
Alcoy (Spain)
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #39 - Dec 18th, 2013 at 4:37am
 
Now that you know that when more long and thick less efficient is the sling... but that have no sense throw twenty kg at one meter, you need search the equilibrium, you sacrifice one little power and efficience in the change of the weight by the speed.

what is the equilibrium? it is a personal answer i think.

But you can start with the less thick and less weight thread possible and with the most density projectile and aerodynamic possible.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lakeslinger
Senior Member
****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 432
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #40 - Dec 18th, 2013 at 5:23am
 
Having read this topic and the various personal preferences about the most ... (whatever) sling with interest, I picked up some ideas for experimenting with very light corded slings.
So I bought a 100m roll of very dense / stiff 2mm mason line and made some slings to try the performance of single corded (especially the release cord) lightweigt slings. The release is awesome, but there are three points to mention here:
1) Personally used to braided cord slings that are from a little up to very much heavier I had to adapt to the different feeling and control while slinging.
2) A small, short pouch (less air drag) tends to tilt sideways and loose the ammo. Imagine a pouch, which´s attachment to the single cords is near the middle height of the ammo when loaded. In comparison a long pouch doesn´t lead to the problem, cause the axis of sideways rotation of ammo and pouch are in different heights. To reduce air drag I chose a cradle sling design.
3) Thin and light cords tangle much easier, so you have to
to choose a good pouch geometry to prevent cord tangling.
The above mentioned long pouch / cradle sling pouch helped also in this point. Another solution is Teg´s idea of asymmetric loading of the pouch that I practice with both, split and solid pouches since he gave me the advice. It means that the ammo is placed more towards the release end of the pouch instead into the center. This leads to a heigth asymmetry of the cord-to-pouch attachment on the retention vs. release side. The principle can be understood if you imagine cross sections of a loaded balearic pouch. If loaded symmetrically the ammo is held first by 4 cords, a little higher then by 2. If loaded asymmetrically there´s a 3-cord step between. This prevents both, the sideways tilt of point 2 and the distortion of the sling, i.e. the cord tangling.
Instead of asymmetric loading of a symmetric pouch one could design an asymmetric pouch with a longer retention side.

When I can do so, I´ll take some pictures of the slings and post them in the picture thread Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
English_Marauder
Descens
***
Offline


Balearic Slinger

Posts: 229
Canada
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #41 - Dec 18th, 2013 at 4:53pm
 
lakeslinger wrote on Dec 18th, 2013 at 5:23am:
3) Thin and light cords tangle much easier, so you have to
to choose a good pouch geometry to prevent cord tangling.


I don't have experience with paracord slings. I made my son a small one with paracord and a leather pouch and it tangled very easily.

Is this a problem inherent of paracord, or thin slings?
Back to top
 

If you want peace- Prepare for War!
 
IP Logged
 
walter
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 2453
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #42 - Dec 18th, 2013 at 6:42pm
 
Don't think its really a problem, but yes they do tangle easier than braided cords.
Back to top
 

Perseverence furthers
 
IP Logged
 
squirrelslinger
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


peace through superior
firepower

Posts: 2870
Ky, USA
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #43 - Dec 18th, 2013 at 6:56pm
 
i find that a cradle sling can throw further, throw faster, and throw heavier ammo, and be more stable...
Paracord and leather. it really helps air resistance.
Back to top
 

“Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results.”
"You don't think the electricity is off. You check it 3 times to make SURE its off"
"Remember, this is not a scalpel. It is a steel wedge that you will be slamming into knotty wood. Hone accordingly."
 
IP Logged
 
lakeslinger
Senior Member
****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 432
Gender: male
Re: The most efficient sling
Reply #44 - Dec 20th, 2013 at 4:25am
 
squirrelslinger wrote on Dec 18th, 2013 at 6:56pm:
i find that a cradle sling can throw further, throw faster, and throw heavier ammo, and be more stable...
Paracord and leather. it really helps air resistance.


They´re really not bad in performance. Here are the pictures of my experiments (double post, also in the picture thread).

The one in the middle of the 2nd picture can be folded to a very small size, I can carry it in the small coin pocket of my jeans.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Kick, Morphy, Rat Man, Chris, vetryan15, joe_meadmaker, Curious Aardvark)