timann
|
Quote from Rat Man on Apr 16th, 2012, 3:24pm:Quote from timann on Apr 15th, 2012, 2:14pm:Quote from Rat Man on Apr 15th, 2012, 1:54pm:Quote from Morphy on Apr 14th, 2012, 9:44pm:Olympic archery rigs have all sorts of crazy gizmos to get every last advantage possible no matter how small. When you get to such a high level, even the smallest things can mean the difference between winning and losing. That's kind of what I am thinking with that comment. Again, whether it's true or not, who knows. I would have to withhold any conclusions until I knew for sure. I agree. If you were slinging for every last fraction of an inch at that sort of level possibly the lesser wind resistance and stretch of a sling made with synthetic material(s) would give you a very small (inches if that?) advantage. For normal, everyday use though I'd say there's no difference. The real differece comes, as I see it, with the use of a sinlge strand of syntetic stuff. 1 to perhaps less than 3 millimeters, and way thinner than paracord. Thinner than you`d trust a natural material, it can be used safely for ultra-slim distance slings. As soon as strands of this super strong materials is braided together it becomes thicker and looses it`s obvious advantage. timann I agree with this for the most part but you can reach a point, regardless of strength, where the cords are too thin. Then they're always getting twisted up or ending up with slack when you don't want it while firing. I find that cords have to have at least some size and weight to them or they're useless. Exactly. I have used horrible thin slings that, among other issues, needed to be untangled between each shot, and after a couple of shots I was more than happy to pick up a braided favorite, so I could enjoy slinging again. timann
|