Rat Man wrote on Mar 2
nd, 2012 at 1:36pm:
xxkid123 wrote on Mar 1
st, 2012 at 9:54pm:
It's a shame that Disney has brought such a bad name towards movies. PIXAR is an exception and a great one at that. Its interesting because I had a discussion in class today, where we were talking about modern art. PIXAR was brought up since some people can consider it art in a movie form, since most of their movie's are great hits and usually have a deeper meaning than the average boy meets girl, girl hates bot, boy goes on quest, boy gets girl.
Disney has brought such a bad name towards movies? What on earth could that mean? Disney has, since long before I was born, created MANY timeless animated masterpieces. Just off the top of my head, Snow White, Bambi, Lady and the Tramp, The Jungle Book, Peter Pan, Cinderella, 101 Dalmatians, etc., etc., etc. Better yet, check this out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Disney_theatrical_animated_featuresYour statement leaves me flabbergasted.
They did have some good ones back in the day (I still love them, see Mulan and The Rescuers Down Under), but I don't trust any of their animated movies anymore and they very nearly cut PIXAR's legs out from under them, so I have a bit of a thing against the modern Disney. If John Carter sucks, I'm going to be unhappy.
Dan wrote on Mar 2
nd, 2012 at 8:29am:
I read the whole triology in a little over a week and since then I can't wait untill the movie comes out.
Being a Bowyer and primitive archer I am really hoping the do a good job on the archery tackle and such in the movie.
Me too! The movie doesn't look bad at the moment, but I don't want to get my hopes up. I teach classes in 'primitive skills', one day I was teaching a mother and her two daughters how to make cordage. The girls were so excited, they kept saying 'We are just like Katniss!'. When they left, I said goodbye to them and tagged 'may the odds be ever in your favor' on the end. You should have seen their eyes.