Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 27
Send Topic Print
Food for thought (religion) (Read 12870 times)
Knaight
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****


Slinging Tennis
Balls!

Posts: 1237
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #165 - Oct 4th, 2011, 12:34am
 
Quote from Bikewer on Oct 3rd, 2011, 8:00pm:
You realize that ALL "holy books" claim to be divinely inspired.... Except perhaps L. Ron Hubbard, who claims he thought the whole thing up himself...

Mohammed, Joseph Smith, the various Buddhist and Hindu texts ....

Even L. Ron Hubbard was pushing it as divine for a while, and after he stopped doing so Scientology continued to claim that it was divinely inspired - though not with those exact terms.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Bikewer
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****


I love Slinging.org!

Posts: 1408
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #166 - Oct 4th, 2011, 10:19am
 
Scientology is a fascinating case.  From the musings of a hack science-fiction writer to a world-wide "religion" worth billions of dollars and claiming numbers of celebrity adherents....
Likely deserves it's own thread.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Knaight
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****


Slinging Tennis
Balls!

Posts: 1237
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #167 - Oct 4th, 2011, 11:56am
 
Quote from Bikewer on Oct 4th, 2011, 10:19am:
Scientology is a fascinating case.  From the musings of a hack science-fiction writer to a world-wide "religion" worth billions of dollars and claiming numbers of celebrity adherents....
Likely deserves it's own thread.

Probably. To some extent, it also deserves study as a cult, as the focus around a single living person, the multiple levels of closeness to this person (and the whole inner circle which isn't affected by general restrictions detail), the extent to which apostasy is conceptually important, and the leader who doesn't even belief much of what he preached are all cult elements. It might be more useful to compare it to the Ayn Rand cult than Christianity or similar.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
HurlinThom
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****


Leverage artillerist

Posts: 1387
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #168 - Oct 4th, 2011, 1:09pm
 
I'd be very careful of a Scientology topic. Those guys can be aggressively defensive if they feel they've been maligned.
Back to top
 
 

When all is said and done more will have been said than done.
Email View Profile   IP Logged
Bikewer
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****


I love Slinging.org!

Posts: 1408
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #169 - Oct 4th, 2011, 2:08pm
 
That's true, but less so now than in the beginning of the cult.   I think they're trying for a lower profile these days.
I had a book years ago called Cults Of Unreason which was written way back when L. Ron himself was knocking around the ocean on his converted trawler as the "Sea Org".    They were really scary back then....
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
peacefuljeffrey
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****


Peace through
superior slinging
power!

Posts: 2686
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #170 - Oct 4th, 2011, 6:11pm
 
Scary in what way? As in, dangerous and intimidating? Prone to violence? Or just "so wacked out that it freaks you out to think people can be so crazy"?
Back to top
 
 

Cradled rock is slung
Once around the back and gone
Flying far and true
View Profile   IP Logged
Masiakasaurus
Slinging.org Moderator
*****


mah-SEE-a-kah-SOR-us

Posts: 4929
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #171 - Oct 4th, 2011, 6:24pm
 
Quote from peacefuljeffrey on Oct 4th, 2011, 6:11pm:
Scary in what way? As in, dangerous and intimidating? Prone to violence? Or just "so wacked out that it freaks you out to think people can be so crazy"?

At that time Scientologists perpetrated the largest infiltration of the US government in the history of our country. Check out Operation Snow White. I'd call early scientologists dangerous and intimidating as a group. As for the current state of the church, I don't know.
Back to top
 
 
Email View Profile WWW siamesetomahawk masiaka   IP Logged
Dan
Interfector Viris Spurii
SlingingGuide Moderator
*****


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 3395
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #172 - Oct 5th, 2011, 8:47am
 
I am not quite sure where this thread is going but this guy has some really solid theology, and has a quick Bilbical point on relegion at the beggining of the video.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juy35TOgQ_o&feature=channel_video_title
 
It is the correct link btw.
Back to top
 
 

1 Samuel 14:7

"Like tying a stone to a sling is the giving of honor to a fool" Proverbs 26:8

SALVATION: By Grace alone, through Faith alone, in Christ alone.
View Profile   IP Logged
Woonilsra
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****




Posts: 1600
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #173 - Oct 5th, 2011, 7:22pm
 
"GOD is awesome, but thanks for the kind words. Without HIM, I am nothing. Tracy" -turbodog061188 1 month ago
 
This is what religion and belief in the supernatural has done to people. It degrades a person to the point where they think they are worthless, that they are nothing, and that only God gives them strength. It's despicable. Where is the morality in saying we all have original sin, and if we don't accept Jesus as our savior, we're tortured for eternity? Where are the morals in punishing finite lifetimes with infinite time? How can they compare?
 
 You have parents raising kids to believe that God is the greatest most awesome thing in the world and life is all about worshiping God, their Lord. It sounds like complete servantry to me, degrading themselves to their king or something. But people aren't worthless, or nothing without God. Correct me if I'm making assumptions here about some of you, because as we have established, plenty of Christians hold different views on some issues, I'm sure this is no different.
 
Throwing out a quote from Bertrand Russell here.
 
"The world, we are told, was created by a God who is both good and omnipotent. Before He created the world He foresaw all the pain and misery that it would contain: He is therefore responsible for all of it. It is useless to argue that the pain in the world is due to sin. In the first place, this is not true; it is not sin that causes rivers to overflow their banks or volcanoes to erupt... If I were going to beget a child knowing that the child was going to be a homicidal maniac, I should be responsible for his crimes., If God knew in advance the sins of which man would be guilty, He was clearly responsible... when He decided to create man."   -"Has Religion Made Useful Contributions to Civilization?, 1930, Bertrand Russel, republished in "Why I am Not a Christian, Bertrand Russell.
 
Thoughts? Corrections? Is Russell accurate in his statement that God would know about sin before he created humans? Is all pain due to suffering, as Russell seems to think Christian Doctrine says?
 
Dan,
I found "Mere Christianity" in my local library, so I'm working on reading through it now. It's a revised copy, but it has the points in it.
Back to top
 
 

"Come on you sons of bitches! Do you want to live forever?"

"A sword is a weapon. The art of swordsmanship is learning how to kill. That is the truth"

"Dead!" I answered, and amiably "Murdered," the Hangman corrected me. "First the alien ... then the Jew. I did no more than you let me do."
Email View Profile   IP Logged
Bikewer
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****


I love Slinging.org!

Posts: 1408
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #174 - Oct 5th, 2011, 8:12pm
 
Probably more verbiage and print has been expended by apologists trying to explain the blatant dichotomy that Woonilsra speaks of than any other.
 
It's a basic and inescapable problem with this "model" of God.  The basic tactic is to invoke "free will".    However, if God is omniscient, and knows the ultimate fate of literally everything... Then we have only the illusion of free will.  Our ultimate fate is set in stone, and of course God would be well aware of that fate.
As I said in a previous post, God makes "salvation" possible for humans (after an unacountably long interval after Adam) and then fails to tell all concerned about the fact, condemning (in the minds of fundamentalist Christians) those people who didn't get the word to Hell.
 
Now, more progressive sects have devised various ways for these poor folks who never got the benefit of conversion to achieve salvation.  Even as long ago as when I was in high school, the prevailing view among Catholics was that folks not exposed to Christianity might be judged in some way....
Which directly contradicted (even in the minds of 10 year olds!) the notion that one had to be baptized into "holy mother church" in order to make Heaven.
Of course, the simple way out of this conundrum is to maintain (if one wishes to maintain a belief in God) that the religious notions of God are incorrect and that some other form of eschatology awaits us at death.    
Or, one can simply accept that gods are an artifact of human consciousness and that death means oblivion.
 
Isaac Asimov, asked the question, "As an atheist, how do you cope with the notion that there is no afterlife?"
Asimov replied succinctly.  "Fearlessly."
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
fattybones
Descens
***


That's not hail!

Posts: 138
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #175 - Oct 5th, 2011, 9:10pm
 
Quote from Bikewer on Oct 3rd, 2011, 9:25am:
Scholars agree that Mark is the earliest of the "Canonical" Gospels.  That is, the Gospels that were eventually accepted into the bible.
It is also the simplest and most straightforward telling of the story.  It evidently dates to no less than about 50 years after the events portrayed.

There is another early document that I referred to; the "Q" document which has never been found other than perhaps in scraps, and which is felt to have influenced Mark.
The other of the four Canonical Gospels are all dated later, and get increasingly more embellished.

 
 
It's also the shortest.  Thanks, experts are better than google.  I had heard somewhere it was John.
Back to top
 
 

Chivalry! It's not the law, it's just a good idea.
View Profile   IP Logged
Dan
Interfector Viris Spurii
SlingingGuide Moderator
*****


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 3395
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #176 - Oct 6th, 2011, 4:51pm
 
Quote from Woonilsra on Oct 5th, 2011, 7:22pm:

Dan,
I found "Mere Christianity" in my local library, so I'm working on reading through it now. It's a revised copy, but it has the points in it.

 
Awesome! I am only few the first few chapters myself but if you have any questions I can read whatever section you are in.
 
As far as Humility in Christianity goes one of the main points repeated often is the word Agape (Greek for "Not Me") or selfless love, which is what Christians should have. A kind of humility that you just put God and others above yourself. Not in any way "degrading", in fact I have found the more active a Christian is in their faith the more joy they will have. Another Main point in Christianity is following Jesus example on earth, as John 15 says:  12 My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. 13 Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.
 
 This is the extreme agape the Jesus Christ had for mankind. Just page through Proverbs and most of the New testament and you well ususaly find somthing on the selfless love of Christianity.
 
Bikewer, as I have posted it around 3 or 4 times now I would really just suggest reading and studying the whole first chapter of Romans yourself for a better understanding of Salvation and Redemption to the further parts of the earth. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%201&version=NIV
 
To both of you guys, Once again going back to Christianity as a religion, if Jesus was religeous perhaps he wouldn't have been hated by the Pharisees and Saducees (Religious leaders of the time) In fact the most relegious people were the ones that had Jesus crucified (after being stripped, beaten spit upon, and flogged).  
 
  There is a lot more detail to it and I would be happy to go into it more if you guys are interested. And if you read Matthew 26-28, Mark 15-16, Luke 23-24, or John 19-20 you can get an even better understanding of what happened because of Jesus Christ's love for you.
Back to top
 
 

1 Samuel 14:7

"Like tying a stone to a sling is the giving of honor to a fool" Proverbs 26:8

SALVATION: By Grace alone, through Faith alone, in Christ alone.
View Profile   IP Logged
Woonilsra
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****




Posts: 1600
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #177 - Oct 6th, 2011, 11:34pm
 
I have no more reason to believe the Bible than I do the Koran, or any Native American myths and stories.  
 
I don't like to use personal examples because I think they can be biased depending on where you live and who you're friends with, but I'm breaking that tradition right now, because so many personal stories come out from religion.
 
Friend of mine was raised somewhat religiously, and when she was younger, round elementary school, she was so terrified she was going to end up in hell that she made up her own religion so she wouldn't.  Religion is fear, I've read this so many times. Hitchens, Russell, Dawkins, I'm sure there are more. And I'm starting to agree. We've got a  fear of no purpose in life or something, so we have these wonderful sounding stories from all cultures across the world. Doesn't make them true.
 
How do you want to define religion then?  
 
religion- a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
Why do you think Christianity doesn't fit this? Or another definition, as there are so many?
 
 Also, I wouldn't be surprised if religious people did those things to Jesus in the Bible, religion is an excellent source of justification for heinous acts and injustices. Just look to the witches of the middle ages, the inquisition, crusades, opposition to birth control, slavery, divorce, marriage for gays, and general intolerance for those not of the same faith and values.
 
That humility looks suspiciously similar to self-denigration then. Is it humbleness, or feeling worthless compared to these ideals that we simply can not replicate without torturing ourselves in the process, for the most part?
Back to top
 
 

"Come on you sons of bitches! Do you want to live forever?"

"A sword is a weapon. The art of swordsmanship is learning how to kill. That is the truth"

"Dead!" I answered, and amiably "Murdered," the Hangman corrected me. "First the alien ... then the Jew. I did no more than you let me do."
Email View Profile   IP Logged
Masiakasaurus
Slinging.org Moderator
*****


mah-SEE-a-kah-SOR-us

Posts: 4929
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #178 - Oct 7th, 2011, 12:18am
 
Quote from Woonilsra on Oct 6th, 2011, 11:34pm:
How do you want to define religion then?

religion- a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

I think that's too broad. Your definition for religion can also include atheism. Plus, it doesn't really take into account other religions besides Christianity. Taoism and Buddhism, for example, say nothing of the cause nor purpose of the Universe. "There is only the way..."
 
How about this: religion is the worldview a person, who is rational in most other respects, adopts to cope with and understand the world in addition to direct observation with implications toward a level of order not seen otherwise. That would make organized religion is the collection of people with similar worldviews.
 
Quote from Woonilsra on Oct 6th, 2011, 11:34pm:
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if religious people did those things to Jesus in the Bible, religion is an excellent source of justification for heinous acts and injustices. Just look to the witches of the middle ages, the inquisition, crusades, opposition to birth control, slavery, divorce, marriage for gays, and general intolerance for those not of the same faith and values.

What's not been used as justification for heinous acts? Lovers have killed each other over a break up (which paradoxically makes a reunion impossible...), atheists have killed in the name of eradicating religion (just read about the Khmer Rouge), depressives harm themselves for things that most people can brush off... A lot of things out there are used for justifying heinous acts.
 
And, yes. Jesus was killed by the religious elite among the Jewish people. Not the most spiritual per se, but those with the most to gain from the then current state of affairs in their religion. From their perspective, Jesus was a liar trying to strip them of what they'd earned.
Quote from Woonilsra on Oct 6th, 2011, 11:34pm:
That humility looks suspiciously similar to self-denigration then. Is it humbleness, or feeling worthless compared to these ideals that we simply can not replicate without torturing ourselves in the process, for the most part?

That's not really an argument or a debate. Turnabout would turn confidence into arrogance, friendliness into licentiousness. If we don't take each other at our word, where does it stop? For clarification, I realize you weren't actually saying that Dan was lying or that religious humility is self-denigration.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Oct 7th, 2011, 1:18am by Masiakasaurus »  
Email View Profile WWW siamesetomahawk masiaka   IP Logged
Bikewer
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****


I love Slinging.org!

Posts: 1408
Gender: male
Re: Food for thought (religion)
Reply #179 - Oct 7th, 2011, 10:13am
 
Dan... I don't normally bother to read passages from the bible as I have no regard for the document (whichever version) as an authoritative text of any sort.  It's just a compilation of writings from human authors.
What I do regard is the actual words of contemporary religious authorities.  Any number of whom from the Protestant side have said very clearly just as I described..."No Jesus, no Salvation."  If you have not had the "born again" experience, you are damned.   Maybe you don't believe this way, but let me assure you that many Protestants in many different sects do.   This would seem to bear out the scenario I proposed about billions of humans being condemned out of mere ignorance.
 
On a more general note.... It's a common feature of religions to feature some sort of submission to "the will of God".   In Islam, it's a central feature.  Although they don't come out and say it as boldly as the Muslims, Christians adopt pretty much the same idea.   Although Buddhists have no idea of a personified God, they too use the same notion in that one "divorces" oneself from the world which is seen as "Maya" or illusion.  
 
On the good side, this can be seen as an attempt to allow believers to deal with the vicissitudes of life.   Child dies?  It's the will of God.   Tornado wipes out your house?  Same thing.   Tsunami kills thousands...   And so on.   The ways of God are mysterious, after all.  Don't worry about it, it's all God's will.  
However...This idea has been cynically exploited by religious and political leaders through history.  The peasants have a miserable, just-clinging to life existence, while the lords sit in luxury in their castles?    Don't worry, it's the will of God.  They'll get theirs in the end....
"Come on, we need to go to war against those "other" people.  The church commands it, it's the will of God.  And if you die in this war, you'll go straight to Heaven."
And so on.  Taken to it's ultimate extension, this attitude leads to a sheeplike acceptance of everything.  The status quo remains the same.  
As James Burke points out in his "The Day The Universe Changed"... The attitude of Christianity in the middle ages was simple:  "The purpose of this life is to get you ready for the next one."
So, as long as you're obedient, nothing much matters.
We see this today regarding attitudes towards the environment.  Why should we worry about fouling the air and water, and stripping the forests and driving thousands of species into extinction?  The end is near...  
 
Fortunately, some religious sects have come to a different viewpoint in recent years, seeing man as the steward of God's creation, and that perhaps the End isn't as near as they thought.  (we just passed another End Times prediction , BTW...Wrong again.)  
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 27
Send Topic Print