Welcome, Guest. Please Login
SLINGING.ORG
 
Home Help Search Login


Poll Poll
Question: sling or bow?



« Created by: paracordslinger on: Jun 30th, 2011 at 6:54pm »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Send Topic Print
Sling vs. Bow (Read 48130 times)
Rat Man
Slinging.org Administrator
*****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 13680
New Jersey, USA
Gender: male
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #30 - Jul 13th, 2011 at 6:01pm
 
mossdog427 wrote on Jul 1st, 2011 at 11:42am:
the real answer is both. archers would be ideal for infantry support and slingers would be a perfect skirmish unit. a unit that never runs out of ammo and never lets you close the gap. that would be nightmarish. there's also the factor of economics which is obviously in favor of the sling. for the same money one could arm 5000 slingers that they could arm 200 archers. it's kind of like asking which is better a back hoe or a bull dozer. it depends on the situation and the better answer is both.


   If I were the commanding general of an ancient army this is the answer I would go with both.  Both weapons have their advantages and limitations.  Along with all of my other usual units I would have my battalion of slingers and my battalion of archers.  However, in that they're small, cheap and easy to make, and easy to carry, every single soldier in my army, whether heavy infantry, cavalry, cook, doctor, or horn blower,  would have at least one sling in his possession and he'd know how to use it. There's no reason not to and lots of circumstances where it could come in very handy.
  Mayan, welcome to slinging.org.  You may be underestimating the power of the sling.  I think that depending on the hit, a glancing blow can do considerable damage.  Even if you didn't kill your opponent you could certainly take him out of the battle for the day.  Also, lead glandes can certainly penetrate the human body and some of the more inferior ancient armor.  Though it's true that a sling projectile looses much of it's power after one hundred feet there's still plenty of power left at the end of a very long shot to do some serious damage.  
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 31st, 2019 at 4:01pm by Rat Man »  
 
IP Logged
 
Jaegoor
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 2811
Gender: male
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #31 - Jul 13th, 2011 at 6:19pm
 
Glandes were shot ballistically.
If they fall down from 100-m height (or more), they are also deadly for an armament.

A Peltast was less expensive than a Hoplit.
That's right., However, cheap they were not. They were specialists for Sling, spear, sword,
to the small Shild.
They were close absolute and singles to fighter.
To underestimate them was deadly.
The Archeologischen findings confirm reports.
Back to top
 

Bono Mellius
 
IP Logged
 
AncientCraftwork
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline



Posts: 2403
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #32 - Aug 19th, 2019 at 3:09pm
 
Jaegoor wrote on Jul 13th, 2011 at 6:19pm:
Glandes were shot ballistically.
If they fall down from 100-m height (or more), they are also deadly for an armament.

A Peltast was less expensive than a Hoplit.
That's right., However, cheap they were not. They were specialists for Sling, spear, sword,
to the small Shild.
They were close absolute and singles to fighter.
To underestimate them was deadly.
The Archeologischen findings confirm reports.



Lead looks to me like a relatively simple way to greatly increase the effectiveness of the sling in battle.

How hard would it have been back in those days to cast lead glandes in comparison to making an arrow? What would the cost of one be compared to an arrow?
Back to top
 

All Glory to God forever and ever, amen
 
IP Logged
 
Sarosh
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline



Posts: 1140
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #33 - Aug 19th, 2019 at 4:06pm
 
AncientCraftwork wrote on Aug 19th, 2019 at 3:09pm:
How hard would it have been back in those days to cast lead glandes in comparison to making an arrow? What would the cost of one be compared to an arrow?


stone points will have much lower range than iron points which we know have comparable range to slung stones so this rules out any tip material other than iron.
iron age came long after the discovery of lead . The knowledge and technology to melt lead into a shape is obtained much more easily than the expertise and experience needed for the making steel points , making identical wooden shafts with the same spine and attaching fletchings with good alignment.
you can't make iron/steel points while campaigning unless you carry a load of tools and create a very hot furnace, but you can make lead glandes during the night by the fire. Some things I 've read but I'm too tired to search the source for are : during a campaign the army stole lead, in the form of utensils or household items,  from nearby enemy villages that the villagers abandoned in fear and made lead ammo out of them. And another is that they made moulds fast by pressing the thumb on the sand.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
funditor
Descens
***
Offline


Ceteram censeo, rem funditam
esse

Posts: 173
Vienna, Austria
Gender: male
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #34 - Aug 20th, 2019 at 3:37am
 
This question can not generally be answered. There are too many vriables that tip the decision to either point. First is the opponent, that has scarcely been discussed so far. The Spanish feared the Inca slingers far more than the archers, as the momentum can kill qrmoured soldiers, whereas stone tips break. Next is the ammo, from historical and archaeological sources we know burned clay from 13 to 350 gram, lead from 10 to 150 gram, and stone from 30 to 450 gram at least, all in varying shapes. Concerning the lead 20g biconoid glans against a phalanx is perhaps almost useless, but gret to hold peltasts at bay. 100g glandes were highly feared by Romqn heavy infantry. 25g dried clay droplet shape bullets may sound like not impressive, but the Uruk soldiers wiped out a city with this bullets and fighting style. Easy and cheap to manufacture and handle like ak47 bullets nowadays. Also very effective if tze degree of armour is not to vast at the opponent.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
funditor
Descens
***
Offline


Ceteram censeo, rem funditam
esse

Posts: 173
Vienna, Austria
Gender: male
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #35 - Aug 20th, 2019 at 4:12am
 
I tend to get the impressions that the size of the bullets generally improves over time, probably due to to increasing degree of armour. In Antiquity body armour was only for the wealthy ones, whereas in Medieval time already qm Gambeson provides quite some protection. Still very late in 17c France there are battles that docunent successful battle turning use of the sling .
Overall counting in all factors I would say thus has to be decided for each encounter. Overall all times and places where historical or archaeological evidence is available, I get the notion that the number of uses per person is in favour of the bow. Though I do not know of any thorough researched number.
Still there are times and spaces, where almost ONLY the sling was used, over a few thousand years in the Balkans and Greece and Mesopotamia, also MIcro-, Mela- and Poly-nesia, and Fireland South America,nas well as Inuit.
My estimate overall of persons in use for any combat or hunting situation worldwide all times is fifty-fifty. Concerning bullets shot with definitely in favour of the sling.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
funditor
Descens
***
Offline


Ceteram censeo, rem funditam
esse

Posts: 173
Vienna, Austria
Gender: male
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #36 - Aug 20th, 2019 at 4:26am
 
Last but not least my favourite - the sling
Main reasons: little space and weight for transport, steric advantage for storage, low probability of damage  during transport, availibiliy and price of bullets, thus higher number of shots. Shallow learning curve thus life-long training. Plus the fun factor 😀
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rat Man
Slinging.org Administrator
*****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 13680
New Jersey, USA
Gender: male
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #37 - Aug 24th, 2019 at 4:32pm
 
     In a survival situation I would first make a sling because they're much quicker and easier to make than a bow and arrows.  There are many materials that you can use in the wild.  This has been covered in great detail on other threads here.  By doing so I'd have a projectile weapon in  my hands on the first or second day.  My next weapon wouldn't be a bow. I'd make an atlatl next for the same reasons I made the sling first.  Assuming I lived long enough to do so I would definitely make a bow also.  A bow is superior in accuracy to the sling, of course, and has superior range to an atlatl. I would have the sling with me at all times, take the atlatl on hunting trips when I was targeting large game, and the bow and arrow would be for everything else.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Morphy
Slinging.org Moderator
*****
Offline


Checkmate

Posts: 8102
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #38 - Aug 24th, 2019 at 7:24pm
 
For food I would go traps and foraging. Then get a bow stave rough it and the arrows out. Set aside to cure, then atlatl, then sling while I'm waiting assuming I'm not dead yet.

Mostly because atlatl does not require high quality cordage to make so it would be an immediate large game weapon.  Sling would need cordage so might as well gather good natural fiber and make enough for a bowstring while I'm at it. Finish sling, make enough for fishing line and make bowstring. Then if stave is cured finish bow. Then most likely die anyways.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
walter
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 2453
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #39 - Aug 24th, 2019 at 10:24pm
 
For me, it is not bow or sling. It is bow and sling plus cordage for large and small game snares. More cordage for gill nets. And still more cordage for tying a camp together...then die  Tongue
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 25th, 2019 at 3:30pm by walter »  

Perseverence furthers
 
IP Logged
 
Kick
Forum Moderation
*****
Offline



Posts: 4451
Finland
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #40 - Aug 25th, 2019 at 6:03am
 
Throwing stick is quickest and easiest. Pointy stick next. Big rock can be good too.
Back to top
 

You are a great guy Kick but also slightly scary at times. - Morphy
"Nothing matters, but it’s perhaps more comfortable to keep calm and not interfere with other people." - H.P. Lovecraft, in a letter to Frank Belknap Long, 7 October, 1923
 
IP Logged
 
Jaegoor
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 2811
Gender: male
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #41 - Aug 25th, 2019 at 6:33am
 
Peitschen Bogen. Sehr einfach gebaut, sehr effektiv
Back to top
 

Bono Mellius
 
IP Logged
 
Rat Man
Slinging.org Administrator
*****
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 13680
New Jersey, USA
Gender: male
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #42 - Aug 25th, 2019 at 2:07pm
 
    In my statement above I was referring to projectile weapons.  The very first weapon I'd make would be a wood tipped spear.  This is something I could make in minutes that would allow me to keep some distance between myself and wild critters.  I could stab and bash with it or throw it. If nothing else having it in my hands would give me a  little confidence. It wouldn't stop a bear, lion, elephant, etc. but it would be better than nothing.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AncientCraftwork
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline



Posts: 2403
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #43 - Aug 25th, 2019 at 3:51pm
 
The sling being inaccurate argument is one that can be mostly overcome by lots and lots of training, every day, from a young age, like they used to in the past. The biggest problem with the sling is the inability to use it in tight spaces, for me.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 6th, 2021 at 11:52am by AncientCraftwork »  

All Glory to God forever and ever, amen
 
IP Logged
 
Sarosh
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline



Posts: 1140
Re: Sling vs. Bow
Reply #44 - Aug 25th, 2019 at 4:20pm
 
AncientCraftwork wrote on Aug 25th, 2019 at 3:51pm:
The sling being inaccurate argument is one that can be mostly overcome by lots and lots of training


yes but still it is the weapon that puts the projectile further away from your eyes than any other contemporary. the closer to the eyes the easier it is to aim with no previous experience using just conscious decisions and logic.
the discussion about survival is when you grab a weapon out of nowhere and you need it ready asap, in that situation i would start with a stick and rocks of different sizes for hand throwing and smashing. for a bow you need too many tools and patience and so many things can go wrong during the making , so next is a javelin and a sling.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Chris, Morphy, Rat Man, joe_meadmaker, Kick, vetryan15, Curious Aardvark)