snowcelt
Tiro
Offline
So far....so good!
Posts: 12
Turku, SW Finland.
|
Hi Luke,
nice work! I studied geology for a year at uni so my knowledge of rocks is limited. You seem to have sandstone but you talk about slate, they are physically two very different types of stone. As the name suggests, sand stone is composed of sand grains compacted either in water or in air, a microscopic or sometimes even with a good hand lens will determine which, i.e. rounded grains were water formed while angular sharp sand grains are usually formed by wind action, as in deserts. If water formed, the colour of the sandstone, and also the lamination or stripes can give some indication as to the conditions the sand was deposited. Red or ochre colours indicate oxygenated conditions as found in shallow water and form FeIII from the oxidation of iron particles. Blue to black indicate low to no oxygen conditions when the iron forms FeII. basically, your particles in your sand are relatively large and as such are not so cohesive. As a result sandstone is soft and easy to work. It's a sedimentary rock. Slate is a metamorphic rock and derives from shale, which is formed from mud/clay particles which are much finer and much more cohesive than sandstone. They are often organic rich muds which mean that the final slate can vary highly in colour. The lamination in slate is often such that if you hit it, it will easily shear away into plates, like pages in a book. The cohesiveness of any one plate will depend on the slate itself. Still, slate is also relatively soft. The organic rich clay and mud will form mica, a glass-like rock wich fuses the particles together. The hardness and cohesiveness will depend on the level of metamorphosis, i.e. how much pressure and temperature the original rocks underwent. Metamorphosed sandstone becomes quartz, a much harder rock, because the individual sandgrains fuse and all lamination is lost. It will a hold a much harder edge but is harder to work.
|