JAG wrote on Sep 11
th, 2014 at 1:26pm:
How can you say that warriors didn't tend to do much writing? Where is your evidence of that? Now it's true limited sources survive, but that does not mean that a conclusion such as yours can be drawn.
Oxnate wrote on Sep 10th, 2014 at 8:04pm:
My other point was that since none of us were around back then, we don't know what the actual martial arts practiced back then looked like. But an easy bet would be that they were far more practical and less philosophical/spiritual than today's martial arts.
My experience is that all traditional chinese martial arts have become more practical and less spiritual since becoming open to the west. You should remember that up to the middle of the 20th Century such knowledge was denied to westerners for spiritual reasons. Yet, even today honoring the dojo and your opponent is customry prior to a fight.
I say that because we not many writings survived. If more had written, then it would be likely that more would have survived.
And you can't assume that ancient Chinese martial arts were anything like Chinese martial arts 50 years ago. That is a conclusion that just cannot be made. It goes against all knowledge that we have of history.
JAG wrote on Sep 11
th, 2014 at 1:26pm:
Again that is a conclusion that just cannot be made. It goes against all knowledge that we have of the ancient warrior classes.
I think Bill Skinner said it better, "Some were just people..."
http://chivalrytoday.com/series/real-knights/ This article gives a fairly balanced look at knights and chivalry. And I'd like to point out that:
Quote:In contrast, the unsavory image of the knight as an unscrupulous soldier seeking plunder and vengeance in the name of “honor” can be found in the pages of medieval chroniclers such as Matthew Paris and Froissart, in depictions of battle and tournament such as the Maciejowski Bible and the Manasseh Codex, and is reinforced by satirical authors of the period, including Dante and Cervantes.
Basically, the contemporary authors tended to depict them as thugs. It wasn't until later that authors depicted them as 'noble'.