JAG wrote on Sep 9
th, 2014 at 4:59am:
I've often noted the complete lack of spiritual thought in the warriors of history. The Chinese martial arts are renowned for it.
As for naked men running around, well i can see the attraction
JAG wrote on Sep 10
th, 2014 at 1:37am:
Oxnate asks "You've known a lot of historic warriors, have you?"
JAG Replies:
Did I claim to? Err.... No. I have however studied enough chinese martial arts to know that each is primarily a philosophy. The same is true of many other fighting systems.
I also have military experience and am well aware of the importance of God to many in uniform.
Personally, God is pointless. Faith however is extremely powerful.
My point to your original point (copied above) is that warriors didn't tend to do much writing. Less than philosophers at least, and very few works survive from anyone who wasn't a general or a king of some sort.
My other point was that since none of us were around back then, we don't know what the actual martial arts practiced back then looked like. But an easy bet would be that they were far more practical and less philosophical/spiritual than today's martial arts.
It goes along with what Bill Skinner said:
Bill Skinner wrote on Sep 9
th, 2014 at 8:18pm:
Most warriors in history were pretty much what we would refer to today as thugs. Once they won, they got the bards to pretty up what they actually did.
That's why you have the noble hero fighting the base churl.
Knights back in the day were thugs, murderers, rapists, and worse. "Chivalry" was added later to try and get those [not polite
] people to shape up. It was unlikely that it was any different in the East. Philosophy and spiritualism were added to "enlighten" the thugs that were doing the fighting. How much they really followed it back then is anyone's guess.