Welcome, Guest. Please Login
SLINGING.ORG
 
Home Help Search Login


Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
The practicality of sling hunting (Read 3037 times)
Matt_C
Funditor
****
Offline


Cruachan!!!

Posts: 736
Cheshire, England
Gender: male
The practicality of sling hunting
Apr 8th, 2007 at 10:18pm
 
I see a few problems, and a few advantages, with hunting with a sling for small game. The first one is required area, a larger sling will often require quite a clear area to travel through, and you often don't spot most small animals in range until you are almost on top of them (at least in my case). It seems to me that for accuracy and practicality a smaller sling is required, which makes doing the tennis style throw and the figure of 8 harder for me, but practice makes perfect.

Now I've not hit anything yet, but I've damn well tried. The most effective tactic for someone of my skill level would be one of ambush, waiting outside an animals den for it to emerge. This gives me the advantage of positioning (I can get to a range where I am most accurate) and means I can find a suitable place to avoid detection. I could just set up a bunch of snares, as well. So sling hunting at my modest skill level is not really that much of a good idea.

I'm sure most of you are much better trackers and shots than me, how would you go about bagging something tastey to eat? Just toddle along and plunk it from a tree branch with a well placed shot? Does the rapid spinning of the stone impart it's energy onto the target, making even a small sling effective?
Back to top
 

The last time I saw a rainbow I threw my beard over it
 
IP Logged
 
bigkahuna
past-moderator
****
Offline



Posts: 3894
Delaware, USA
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #1 - Apr 8th, 2007 at 10:23pm
 
I know how to hunt but don't believe in hunting except in a survival situation. As far as taking game is concerned it is much more efficient to set a number of snares than to rely on your hunting prowess. Or drive to a Burger King. Grin
Back to top
 

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
John Walker  
IP Logged
 
Matt_C
Funditor
****
Offline


Cruachan!!!

Posts: 736
Cheshire, England
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #2 - Apr 8th, 2007 at 10:25pm
 
Only if I get to eat the acne encrusted teenager unwittingly handing me a bag of grease and cheese.
Back to top
 

The last time I saw a rainbow I threw my beard over it
 
IP Logged
 
bigkahuna
past-moderator
****
Offline



Posts: 3894
Delaware, USA
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #3 - Apr 8th, 2007 at 10:28pm
 
You have to set a snare for him first. Grin
Back to top
 

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
John Walker  
IP Logged
 
1srelluc
Ex Member


Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #4 - Apr 9th, 2007 at 1:24am
 
     It is a hard thing to hit/kill with a sling on a game animal. It can be done but the kills I have were as much luck as anything else. A fox and a groundhog were both in a open field and I was on a railroad bed. Pretty much the same with rabbits. I had wide open road shots. I missed a heck of a lot more than I hit. All and all a sling is a area type weapon. Sling it at a bunch of the enemy and let God worry about who it hits.  The best I can do with the time I devote to pratice is hitting a big coffee can 1/3 of the time at 20 meters or so. That is not good enough for me to just depend on a sling to hunt. It would be a good way for me to lose weight more than likely.

     In the woods the sling is best used to frighten game to move, hopefully in your direction. Trees and brush preclude much else. A short sling works best. It is a good tool to use in the woods to be able to get a shot at game. I used my sling once to scare a Bear away from my stand.  It was too little to shoot and too dumb to leave.  I don't like them around when deer hunting.

     I am not a big fan of snares. You will be just as likely to catch a housecat as a rabbit. They do work well on trails though, there is no dought about that. If you ain't too picky about what you catch that is. At least with a leg hold steeltrap I can let loose what I don't want. Usually dogs and fox are only caught by their toes and will lay down and not try to twist their leg/toes off.  You can let Rover go usually. Cats will for the most part break a leg in the trap and will need to be dispatched. Nothing worse for trapping than Kitty limping home with 3 legs! With snares most everything is dead when you check them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lobohunter
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


where be a rock and a
string there be a sling

Posts: 1945
Cottage Grove or
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #5 - Apr 9th, 2007 at 5:54pm
 
What!!!!!!!!! hunt with the sling A total impossibility. Has never and could never be done
LOL
Back to top
 
Albert Scott C bigbadwolf41 77940+hwy+99+south,+Spc+22  
IP Logged
 
Matt_C
Funditor
****
Offline


Cruachan!!!

Posts: 736
Cheshire, England
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #6 - Apr 9th, 2007 at 6:09pm
 
lobohunter wrote on Apr 9th, 2007 at 5:54pm:
What!!!!!!!!! hunt with the sling A total impossibility. Has never and could never be done
LOL


That's not what I said, lobo! I know of your efforts in this area, and a few other peoples. It's just most of us are not nearly skilled enough to hit even small game at distances that would make a sling practical.
Back to top
 

The last time I saw a rainbow I threw my beard over it
 
IP Logged
 
lobohunter
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


where be a rock and a
string there be a sling

Posts: 1945
Cottage Grove or
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #7 - Apr 9th, 2007 at 6:18pm
 
Matt_C wrote on Apr 9th, 2007 at 6:09pm:
lobohunter wrote on Apr 9th, 2007 at 5:54pm:
What!!!!!!!!! hunt with the sling A total impossibility. Has never and could never be done
LOL


That's not what I said, lobo! I know of your efforts in this area, and a few other peoples. It's just most of us are not nearly skilled enough to hit even small game at distances that would make a sling practical.

pardon me but How could I resist lol Grin
Back to top
 
Albert Scott C bigbadwolf41 77940+hwy+99+south,+Spc+22  
IP Logged
 
Matt_C
Funditor
****
Offline


Cruachan!!!

Posts: 736
Cheshire, England
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #8 - Apr 9th, 2007 at 6:22pm
 
Hehe, I see! Tell me, do you think if I got better at judging range I'd have a better chance of getting something onto a dinner plate?
Back to top
 

The last time I saw a rainbow I threw my beard over it
 
IP Logged
 
lobohunter
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


where be a rock and a
string there be a sling

Posts: 1945
Cottage Grove or
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #9 - Apr 9th, 2007 at 6:29pm
 
yes You would know when not to hurl a stone. But most of my own personal luck with sling come with in distances I could have thrown a rock and hit them. mind you that it helps that fist size rock break small game lol
Back to top
 
Albert Scott C bigbadwolf41 77940+hwy+99+south,+Spc+22  
IP Logged
 
Markmyster
Tiro
**
Offline


Always

Posts: 49
Ontario Canada
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #10 - Apr 9th, 2007 at 7:54pm
 
I hunt with a sling and hitting and killing is not the point, the fun is in trying something that is nearly impossible. If I wanted to kill I would use a gun or crossbow. To date in only 35 years of trying I have slung and killed 3 ducks 1 rabbit and 6 blackbirds. Impossible no, barely possible, yes.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bigkahuna
past-moderator
****
Offline



Posts: 3894
Delaware, USA
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #11 - Apr 9th, 2007 at 9:07pm
 
Heck....if I was throwing razor barbed lead glands like Lobo does I would be killing stuff too.......If I could hit something Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
John Walker  
IP Logged
 
lobohunter
Interfector Viris Spurii
*****
Offline


where be a rock and a
string there be a sling

Posts: 1945
Cottage Grove or
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #12 - Apr 11th, 2007 at 4:41pm
 
bigkahuna wrote on Apr 9th, 2007 at 9:07pm:
Heck....if I was throwing razor barbed lead glands like Lobo does I would be killing stuff too.......If I could hit something Roll Eyes

bigkahuna
well they are quite easy to make
Back to top
 
Albert Scott C bigbadwolf41 77940+hwy+99+south,+Spc+22  
IP Logged
 
Monster
Descens
***
Offline



Posts: 234
Calgary, Canada
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #13 - Apr 11th, 2007 at 8:42pm
 
Probably why spears, bows, guns were invented.  To increase the odds of coming home with food. 

I find flocks of ducks and geese on the ground are the best target.  You really don't have to be too accurate.  Anything flying seems to be able to avoid the rocks no matter how close to the target I get.  It might not be sporting hitting birds on the ground but it works.
Back to top
 

-Self inflicted wounds don't count for sympathy.&&
 
IP Logged
 
jml11220
Tiro
**
Offline


Slinging Rocks!

Posts: 15
Brooklyn, NY
Gender: male
Re: The practicality of sling hunting
Reply #14 - Apr 14th, 2007 at 2:28am
 
Just as a hypothetical thought, if you had a solid pouched sling that could hold 20 pebbles instead of one large rock, wouldn't hunting something like ducks or squirrels be easier?  A spray of small, fast moving stones would at least stun a critter enough to walk up and dispatch it, even if the shot didn't kill it.  Might not be the most humane, but if it's my survival on the line, sorry Alvin.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: joe_meadmaker, Kick, vetryan15, Morphy, Chris, Rat Man, Curious Aardvark)