Gunsonwheels wrote on May 14
th, 2007 at 11:33pm:
Mythbusters is running in the background... maybe we should submit this... could prove good entertainment anyway...
Seriously (well a little more anyway), I've personally found dividing any of the throws into two parts helps me. Even with a helicopter style if I consider the initial rotations as the "setup" and the final powering into the release as "the throw" things seem to work better. I believe the Craig article talks about this. I know "the throw" has to happen at the right point in the "setup" or I can't hit much of anything. I also know if I concentrate on the timing of "the throw" coming out of the "setup" I can almost always either hit the target of get close enough to scare it real good...
Of course sv's, aussies and the Apache all start "the throw" with little or no setup. I personally think it's harder to get really accurate with these styles.
with the apache and so forth reallly ok. I myself consider the helicopter really nothing more than a differnt kind of wind up. very uasable with longer slings.
I think I must agree about the set up. infact I beleave there are three parts to a throw.
1.the wind up. (the helicotper)
2. the set up (getting the pouch directly behind)
3. the release(in my case a over hand throw