english
Ex Member
|
Yeah, I just got DVD of ROTK. What I really thought about it was how it was very stereotyped; the good guys have swords, self bows, long hair, and all that rubbish. Bad guys have eastern style composite bows, ugly busted-up faces, glaives, pikes, clubs, maces. Still quite a good film though, really. Anyway, I thought that most of the props in the Last Samurai were well researched and correct, even down to the ninja techniques and weapons (like the way they broke in to kill the Samurai guy by jumping over the walls on each others' shoulders). However, the film did rather back up the myth of superiority of Japanese swords. They are not THAT good. They look very nice, and no doubt they are very sharp, but there are many stories of blades sticking in bodies, and blades breaking; even one legend of a samurai praying in battle, so that the Gods would help him pull his sword out of the body of a (former) enemy. A medieval sword would probably be deadlier on the battlefield; even an Anglo Saxon sword. The Samurai actually began with prominence in the bow and arrow. Indeed, early Japanese books say the Samurai were trained in the way of the "horse and bow", no mention of the sword. The sword was merely another weapon in a long line of weapons the Samurai would use in battle; beginning with the bow (the Maru-ki, a self bow, in the early stages, and the Shi Ge To Yumi later on, the aforementioned bamboo laminate bow, later on, around the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries [I looked this up, and found it in the book "Longbow"]) then the spear, then sword, then the wakizashi [short sword for those who don't know], and then right down to bare fists: this really did happen sometimes. It is then no wonder that Kyudo and Kyujutsu (the archery) is more popular then fencing, and even considered the highest of all martial arts, the most spiritual. I'd still like to know more about the early Japanese bows, because although I now know the name, I haven't actually seen any pictures.
|