Slinging.org Forum | |
https://slinging.org/forum/YaBB.pl
General >> General Slinging Discussion >> Speed measurements https://slinging.org/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1601350352 Message started by IronGoober on Sep 28th, 2020 at 11:32pm |
Title: Speed measurements Post by IronGoober on Sep 28th, 2020 at 11:32pm
Move this post if needed to "Here be Maths."
https://youtu.be/LHXB931PNcE My best is 106mph with a 160g projectile. I doubt I can do much more. Maybe 1 or 2 mph faster with this sling, as my best yesterday was 104, today 106. |
Title: Re: Speed measurements Post by Sarosh on Sep 29th, 2020 at 5:24am
I think we have similar output and you might be better. 106mph 160g would be 180m-200m, it puts into perspective those early records, 200g 350m.
|
Title: Re: Speed measurements Post by joe_meadmaker on Sep 29th, 2020 at 9:58am
Despite your taunting in the credits, I had to watch until the end. :)
Do you think you could get a higher speed with a rock (or something else with a solid shape) that weighs 160g? I'm curious if the un-solid nature of a rusty ball causes a less efficient transfer of energy. |
Title: Re: Speed measurements Post by IronGoober on Sep 29th, 2020 at 10:10am Sarosh wrote on Sep 29th, 2020 at 5:24am:
Yeah, I totally agree with the last bit, but I think you have me beat on speed, esp. with tennis balls. But yes, Melvin Gaylor or Larry bray's records...How? They must have tendons like steel cable. joe_meadmaker wrote on Sep 29th, 2020 at 9:58am:
Hehe. I thought about leaving some reloading footage in, to make it go longer, but I like the way I did it in the end. I wonder about that too. From Sarosh's videos on speed measurement, He did see differences between a tennis ball and a similarly weighted stone. So, yeah, there may be a small amount lost during acceleration due to extra drag from more cross-sectional area. I was using my usual target sling, but I want to try the same with a less "drag-y" sling as well. |
Title: Re: Speed measurements Post by Shakli on Oct 11th, 2020 at 3:33am
Ok so I watched you over and over at 0.25 speed. Take my input here with a grain of salt as I have yet to do this my self but here goes:
The good: You are using your hip and shoulder well to get your power, which is why you are able to throw so fast. The bad: You are not using your back at all. The truck of your body is moving as one block instead of spiraling though your back. I am guessing that if the order of the throw is hip, stomach, scapula, shoulder, elbow, wrist, you will get the max amount of power from your body. Again take this with a grain of salt, since I cant actually do what I am talking about. I will be working on it though. Will let you know in 2-3 months if I succeed and if my assumption is correct. Edit: Thank you so much for this clip it really helps figure out technique. |
Title: Re: Speed measurements Post by IronGoober on Oct 11th, 2020 at 10:44pm Shakli wrote on Oct 11th, 2020 at 3:33am:
I think you are right, actually. The kinetic train is most efficient if the hips rotate first, then the shoulders/core. If you watch pitching/javelin throwing, this is always the case with world-class athletes. In pitching it is called shoulder-to-hip separation. I have about 0 of that. It is probably the case for slinging as well, that it would be most powerful/efficient transfer of muscle power into the sling to do it as you suggest. I just don't know how to reprogram 12 years of my own slinging habits. I wish there were a good way to do it. |
Title: Re: Speed measurements Post by NooneOfConsequence on Oct 12th, 2020 at 2:36pm
For reference, the fastest baseball pitch without a sling was 105.1 mph with a ~150g baseball.
https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/fastest-baseball-pitch-(male)/ |
Slinging.org Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |